有关实质真理论的若干问题——陈波与吉拉·谢尔的对话  

Some Questions about Substantive Theory of Truth——Interview between Chen Bo and Gila Sher

作　　者：陈波[1] 吉拉.谢尔 徐召清[3] Chen Bo;Gila Sher;Xu Zhaoqing

机构地区：[1]北京大学哲学系,北京100871 [2]加利福利亚大学圣地亚哥分校哲学系,美国ca920930119 [3]四川大学公共管理学院,四川成都610065

出　　处：《河南社会科学》2018年第7期92-98,共7页Henan Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目(17ZDA024)

摘　　要：建立实质真理论的工作包括两个方面:一是在实质方法论的基础上对非实质真理论(包括真理紧缩论、静默论和去引号论)进行批判,二是对实质真理进行正面阐述。实质真理论的基本原则包括:真理的内在性、超越性和规范性;"多重"的符合原则以及逻辑性原则。运用实质真理论来说明数学真理,不需要假定一种关于数字个体的柏拉图主义;实质真理论的发展不仅扭转了说谎者悖论与真理论的关系,而且也有助于消除说谎者悖论的消解方案面临的特设性指责。另外,谢尔比较了实质真理论与塔斯基真理论和多元真理论等的差异。Sher’s work to establish substantive theory of truth can be divided into two parts:one is a critique of non-substantive theory of truth(including deflationism,quietism and disquotationalism)on the substantivist approach,and the other is positive development of a substantivist theory of truth.The fundamental principles in substantive theory of truth include:“immanent”,“transcendent”,and“normative”of truth;the principle of“Manifold Correspondence”;and the principle of“Logicality”.When applying substantive approach to mathematical truth,there is no need to commit to a Platonism about numerical individuals.Substantive theory of truth not only reverses the relation between the Liar paradox and theory of truth,but also helps to explain away the“ad hocness”charge to solutions of Liar paradox.Sher also compares substantive theory of truth with Tarski’s theory of truth and pluralism of truth.

关 键 词：实质真理论 真理紧缩论 “多重”的符合 说谎者悖论 塔斯基真理论 多元真理论 

分 类 号：B0[哲学宗教—哲学理论]