检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:毕珊珊[1] 姜侃 冯云[1] BI Shanshan;JIANG Kan;FENG Yun(Transport Planning and Research Institute,Ministry of Transport,Beijing 100028,China;Shandong Superhighway Road Use New Material Technology Co.Ltd.,Jinan 250031,China)
机构地区:[1]交通运输部规划研究院,北京100028 [2]山东高速路用新材料技术有限公司,山东济南250002
出 处:《山东交通学院学报》2018年第2期50-54,62,共6页Journal of Shandong Jiaotong University
摘 要:为推进深圳港集装箱运输的持续、健康发展,针对港口综合竞争力评价问题,以珠三角地区的深圳、香港、广州三港为研究对象,基于系统用户评价问卷调查的结果,采用AHP层次分析法,以港口集装箱运输系统综合竞争力为目标层,构建了评价指标体系,并分别对三港进行竞争力和优劣势评价。结果表明,深圳港集装箱运输系统在总体上落后于香港港,在港口自然条件与设施状况和系统服务水平方面比广州港具有较大优势。In view of the evaluation of the comprehensive competitiveness of the port,Shenzhen Port,Hong Kong Port and Guangzhou Port is taken as the research objects of the Pearl River Delta Region,based on the questionnaire survey results of“System User Evaluation”,the AHP analytic hierarchy process is used and the comprehensive competitiveness of container shipping system is taken as the target layer,the evaluation index system is established and the competitiveness and advantages and disadvantages of the three ports are evaluated respectively.The results show that the container shipping system in Shenzhen lags behind the system of Hong Kong Port in general,and it has a greater advantage over the port′s natural condition and facilities and service levels of Guangzhou port.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49