检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘湘 LIU Xiang
出 处:《郑州航空工业管理学院学报(社会科学版)》2018年第4期55-65,共11页Journal of Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics(Social Science Edition)
摘 要:环境保护的观念将全面渗透到法律体系中,在经济法相关立法中加入环境因素,已经成为必然的趋势。文章从《欧盟运行条约》第101条出发,尝试总结出环境协议进行反垄断豁免的判断条件与适用流程。首先判断环境协议是否属于受《欧盟运行条约》第101条(1)款规制的限制竞争的垄断协议,进而通过对《欧盟运行条约》第101条(3)款针对限制竞争四个豁免构成要件的解读,认定垄断协议是否具有真正保护环境的根本目的,计算其保护环境所产出的效益是否可以抵消垄断所带来的不利影响,并能使得消费者从中获益,从而认定欧盟反垄断法自由市场竞争中对环境协议做出减让的判断条件,为我国环境协议的反垄断豁免提供参考借鉴。This article starting from Article(3)101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,tries to summarize the conditions and procedures for how to judge if the environmental agreement belongs to monopoly agreements.First,it is necessary to determine whether the environmental agreement is subject to the Article(1)101 of the Functioning of the European Union.Then,use the Article(3)101 of the Functioning of the European Union in four restricting competition exemptions,it is determined whether the monopoly agreement has the real purpose of protecting environment.Therefore,it can be concluded that the concessionary conditions for the concession of the environmental agreement in the free market competition.EU competition law provides a reference for the the environmental agreement in China.
分 类 号:D922.68[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.195