检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李旭涛 LI Xutao(Ningxia Key Laboratory of Electrical Energy Security,State Grid Ningxia Electric Power Research Institute,Ningxia 750002,China)
机构地区:[1]国网宁夏电力有限公司电力科学研究院宁夏电力能源安全重点实验室,宁夏银川750002
出 处:《中国电力》2018年第7期1-6,共6页Electric Power
基 金:国家重点研发计划资助项目(2017YFB0902000)~~
摘 要:同塔双回短线路在电磁暂态研究中具有多种建模方法,线路模型的选择直接影响潜供电流的计算结果。建立4机系统对同塔双回短线路的潜供电流进行仿真,对比分析了EMTP(电磁暂态程序)中输电线路的3种建模方法在潜供电流稳态值校核与暂态过程研究中的差异,并结合理论分析了引起各模型计算差异的原因,给出了同塔双回短线路潜供电流研究的线路模型选取建议。There are many modeling methods for the short double circuit overhead lines on the same tower in the electromagnetic transient analysis.The modelling methods directly influence the simulated results of of the secondary arc current.In this paper,the simulation models of four-generator system including the short double circuit overhead lines are built by the EMTP(Electro-Magnetic Transient Program)software for simulating the secondary arc current.The differences among the three kinds of line models in EMTP are compared in the steady state calculation and transient state research.Based on the theoretical analysis,the explanations for the differences of the three models are discussed.Besides,the suggestions of model selection in secondary arc current research for the short double circuit overhead lines on the same tower are given in the paper.
关 键 词:线路模型 同塔线路 潜供电流 恢复电压 EMTP
分 类 号:TM751[电气工程—电力系统及自动化]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28