传统腹股沟疝修补术和无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的疗效分析  

Clinical effect analysis of traditional inguinal hernia repair and tension-free herniorrhaphy for inguinal hernia

作　　者：刘世斌 Liu Shibin(Banqiao Center Hospital of Fushun County in Zigong City,Sichuan Province 643204)

机构地区：[1]四川省自贡市富顺县板桥中心卫生院,643204

出　　处：《中国社区医师》2018年第22期51-52,共2页Chinese Community Doctors

摘　　要：目的:探讨传统腹股沟疝修补术和无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的疗效。方法:收治腹股沟疝患者50例,随机分为两组。对照组给予传统腹股沟疝修补术,治疗组给予无张力疝修补术,比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、下床活动时间、术后疼痛及术后并发症。结果:治疗组手术时间、术中出血、住院时间及下床活动时间均少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗组术后1、3、5 d的VAS评分明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗组术后并发症发生率明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:无张力疝修补术能够有效治疗腹股沟疝,安全性高,术后恢复快。Objective:To investigate the clinical effect of traditional inguinal hernia repair and tension-free herniorrhaphy for inguinal hernia.Methods:50 cases of patients with inguinal hernia were divided into two groups randomly.The control group was given traditional inguinal hernia repair,and the treatment group was given tension-free herniorrhaphy,the operation time,the amount of intraoperative bleeding,the time of hospitalization,the time of ambulation,the postoperative pain and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.Results:The operation time,intraoperative bleeding,the time of hospitalization,and ambulation time in the treatment group were less than those in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The VAS score of 1 day,3 day and 5 day in treatment group was significantly lower than that in control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The incidence of postoperative complications in the treatment group was significantly lower than that in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Tension-free Hernioplasty could treat inguinal hernia effectively,with had high safety and quick postoperative recovery.

关 键 词：腹股沟疝 疝修补术 无张力疝修补术 术后疼痛 并发症 

分 类 号：R656.21[医药卫生—外科学]