基于简化BIN法对寒区温室供暖系统的分析  

Analysis of Greenhouse Heating System in Severe Cold Area based on Simplified BIN Method

作　　者：许国锋 李庆才 姜涛 刘逸[1,4] 郑大宇[5] XU Guo-feng;LI Qing-cai;JIANG Tao;LIU Yi;ZHENG Da-yu(School of Energy and Civil Engineering,Harbin University of Commerce;Heilongjiang Province 904 Environmental Engineering Investigation and Design Institute;Aerospace Technology Holdings Group Co.,Ltd.;Northeast Petroleum University;School of Light Industry,Harbin University of Commerce)

机构地区：[1]哈尔滨商业大学能源与建筑工程学院 [2]黑龙江省九0四环境工程勘察设计院 [3]航天科技控股集团有限公司 [4]东北石油大学 [5]哈尔滨商业大学轻工学院

出　　处：《建筑热能通风空调》2018年第6期16-20,共5页Building Energy & Environment

基　　金：黑龙江省博士后资助经费(LBH-Z15028)

摘　　要：为了改善目前我国寒冷地区温室大棚供暖方案高耗能、高污染的现状,采用简化温频法(BIN)对温室能耗进行计算。对土壤源热泵供暖、电锅炉供暖以及燃气锅炉供暖,从其节能性、环保性和经济性三个方面进行详细对比分析。研究结果表明:在节能性方面,土壤源热泵系统最节能(PER为92%);在环保性方面,土壤源热泵系统、电锅炉系统实现零排放;在经济性方面,土壤源热泵系统初投资最高是电锅炉系统的9.6倍,是燃气锅炉的8.7倍,但是其全年供暖费用以及费用年值最低,燃气锅炉的全年供暖费用最高,电锅炉供暖系统初投资最低。In order to improve the current situation of high energy consumption and high pollution of greenhouse heating schemes in cold regions in China,the energy consumption of greenhouse was calculated with simplified BIN method.The ground source heat pump heating,electric boiler heating and gas boiler heating,from the energy saving,environmental and economic aspects of a detailed comparative analysis.The results show that:in the aspect of energy saving,the soil source heat pump system is the most energy efficient(PER is 92%);in the aspect of environmental protection,soil source heat pump system,the system of electric boiler to achieve zero emissions;in the economic aspect,the initial investment of soil source heat pump system Up to 9.6 times the electric boiler system,8.7 times the gas boiler,However,the yearround heating cost and annual cost of the groundsource heat pump system are the lowest,the annual heating cost of the gas boiler is the highest,and the initial investment of the electric boiler heating system is the lowest.

关 键 词：简化BIN法 温室大棚 节能分析 环保分析 经济分析 

分 类 号：TU832.1[建筑科学—供热、供燃气、通风及空调工程]