专利民事诉讼案件中行政确权困局的路径选择研究——以司法审查权为视角  

Research on the Solutions to Administrative Confirmation Dilemma in Patent Infringement Litigation——From the Perspective of Judicial Examination Power

作　　者：蒋华胜 孙远风 杨岚 JIANG Hua-sheng;SUN Yuan-feng;YANG Lan(Guangzhou Intellectual Property Court,Guangzhou 510000,China;Guangzhou Intermediate People’s Court,Guangzhou 510000,China)

机构地区：[1]广州知识产权法院,广州510000 [2]广州市中级人民法院,广州510000

出　　处：《科技与法律》2018年第4期41-48,共8页Science Technology and Law

摘　　要：我国专利法主要沿用"民行二元分立"体制,专利民事诉讼往往伴之以专利行政确权诉讼,从而导致专利民事诉讼中的法院无法对专利行政确权一并处理。这种二元分立体制影响了诉讼效率和个案公正。而超越专利"民行二元分立"的体制,可赋予法院在民事诉讼程序中对行政确权行为的司法审查权,具有合理性和可行性。专利民事诉讼程序在允许法院对专利行政确权行为进行审查的前提下,通过制度设计对司法审查范围、审查效果以及如何统一裁判尺度进行路径选择,从制度层面提出具体构想来加强对专利权的保护,以期进一步确立司法在专利保护中的主导地位。Patent infringement litigation is often accompanied by the patent administrative confirmation process.Chinese Patent Law mainly follows the system of"binary separation of patent infringement procedure and patent invalidation procedure",resulting in the civil court participating in patent litigation notbeing able to conduct a proper review of patent validity in the meantime.In practice,this binary separation makes the litigation efficiency greatly reduced and affects the justness.It is reasonable and feasible to revise the binary separation system and allow the courts to examine the validity of patent in infringement cases.Based on the necessity of allowing civil courts to examine patent validity,this article discusses the scope of the examination,the effect of the examination and how to unify the judgment criteria,and proposes the concrete conception from the practical operation level.

关 键 词：二元分立体制 专利侵权 专利审查 

分 类 号：D913.4[政治法律—民商法学]