检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄振羽[1] 沈影 HUANG Zhen-yu;SHEN Ying(School of Government,Sun Yat-Sen University,Guangzhou,Guangdong 510275;Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine,Harbin,Heilongjiang 150004)
机构地区:[1]中山大学政治与公共事务管理学院,广东广州510275 [2]黑龙江中医药大学临床医学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150004
出 处:《牡丹江大学学报》2018年第8期38-41,共4页Journal of Mudanjiang University
摘 要:随着当前政治经济环境的变化,避责成为了解释当前政府行为特征的一种重要视角和流行概念。基于避责行为假设、避责原因、避责策略与避责后果建立分析框架,指出医疗体制困难和外部公众的舆论压力导致了政府采取避责行为,有意模糊责任和寻找替罪羊是其医患纠纷中采用的避责策略,避责后果是医疗资源的稀缺和医患冲突的持续加剧。最后,避责视角是当前对不同国家的政府行为和公共政策选择进行比较研究的可选工具。With the environmental change of policy and economy,blame avoidance has become an important angle and a pop concept to explain the government’s behavior.Based on a framework built here,it is argue that(1)the difficulty in medical system reform and public pressure from outside cause the government to be blameavoidance;(2)intentionally blurring responsibility and finding a scapegoat are the blame-avoidance strategies used by government in hospital-patient dispute;(3)scarcity of medical resources and the continuous intensification of conflicts between doctors and patients are the consequence of government’s blame-avoidance.At last,it is suggested that the theory of blame-avoidance should be a comparative study tool of studying government behavior and making public policy among different countries.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229