维护一个中国框架的法理路径:从台湾现行规定的角度  

Legal Path of Using Taiwan Current Regulatiens to Maintain the “One-China Framework”

作　　者：段磊[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院 [2]武汉大学两岸及港澳法制研究中心

出　　处：《台湾研究》2018年第4期75-84,共10页Taiwan Studies

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费专项项目"两岸关系视野下台湾地区现行‘宪法’的政治功能研究"(2017QN012);教育部哲学社会科学重大攻关项目"关于反分裂国家必要措施的法律问题研究"(17JZD030)资助

摘　　要：在两岸关系主要矛盾体现为统"独"矛盾时,应将规范文本中体现出"一中性"的"中华民国宪法"方面等台湾现行规定视为某种可用于维护"一个中国"框架的资源。在运用这一资源的过程中,面临着来自历史和现实两方面的实际困境,前者体现为如何处理《废除六法全书指示》对"中华民国宪法"做出"伪宪法"界定带来的历史遗留问题,后者体现为如何应对"中华民国"政治含义的模糊性与多样性带来的负面影响。应采取历史定位与现实定位相分离、规范含义与政治含义相分离、合法性与有效性相分离的思路,消解运用"中华民国宪法"资源过程中出现的历史与现实困境。While the principal contradiction in cross-Strait relationship lies within the conflicts between“unification and independence”,the legal norms in“Constitution of the Republic of China”which conveys“One China”feature shall be deemed positive resources in maintaining the“One China”framework.The application of“Constitution of the ROC”is confronted with historical and realistic challenges,the former rests with the question left over by history in which the“Instruction in Abrogation of Six Codes”identified the“Constitution of the ROC”as a“Bogus Constitution”,and the latter appears as the negative influences brought by the ambiguous and diverse political connotations of“Republic of China”.The historical and realistic challenges in using the“Constitution of ROC”are to be dealt with the detachment of historical positions from realistic positions,normative connotations from political connotations,legality from validity.

关 键 词：一个中国框架 “中华民国宪法” 宪法思维 

分 类 号：D618[政治法律—政治学]