检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:易继明[1] YI Ji-ming(Law School,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China)
机构地区:[1]北京大学法学院,北京100871
出 处:《西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2018年第5期50-63,共14页Journal of Northwest University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
摘 要:《国家知识产权战略纲要》颁布实施十年以来,知识产权司法保护体制建设和知识产权审判机制改革取得了显著进展。从效果来看,司法保护发挥了主导作用;司法审判效率得以提高;知识产权保护的社会满意度不断提升;知识产权案件数量增长变缓。为配合下一步知识产权强国建设,建议进一步深化知识产权司法改革,建立统一的知识产权上诉法院,推进知识产权专门法院体系建设,做好知识产权复审机构的准司法改革;推进知识产权司法审判机制改革,建立中国特色的先例制度,完善证据及技术事实查明制度、损害赔偿的确定机制和执行制度、重复侵权的惩罚机制;在加强对侵害知识产权行为刑事制裁的同时,避免民事侵权行为的"刑事化";充分利用和适应新技术、新领域、新业态的出现和发展,创新对法律的解释和司法实践,配合先例制度,克服知识产权法定主义的缺陷,充分保护权利人,并反馈到知识产权立法,使其具有普适性和前瞻性。The National IP Strategy Outline has been implemented for 10 years,with the IP protecting system and IP trial mechanism improved significantly.As a result,judicial protection of IP becomes the main relief route;IP trial becomes more efficient;IP protection becomes more satisfying;increasing of IP case number is slowing down,yet with complexity increased,reflecting better IP quality.To sontruct an intellectual property powerful country,further reformation of intellectual property judicial protection is necessary,and it is suggested to:set up a uniform appellate IP court,push forward the construction of court system specific to intellectual property trial and reform the reexamination/validity exam organs to judicial courts;push forward reformation of trial mechanism by establishing a precedent case system with Chinese characteristics,improving evidence rules and technical finding rules,improving damage calculating mechanism,strengthening enforcement of judgments and punishment rules for repeated infringements,improving credit supersivion and transparency of enforcement cases and avoiding excessive intervenation of criminal trial while strengthening criminal punishment of intellectual property infringements;establish a legal system more generalized and more forseeing in view of new techniques,new industries and new business models by innovating in judicial interpretation and judicial practice of the laws and finally feeding back the innovation to legislature via the precedent case system to avoid the defects of the Numerus Clausus Principle of Intellectual Property and protect right holders sufficietly.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15