刘承幹刻单疏本《春秋正义》所附《校勘记》得失考述  

Review on the Gains and Loses of Collating Notes Attached to the Edition of the Single Copy of Annotation of Justice in spring and Autumn Carved by Liu Chenggan

作　　者：樊宁 谷玲玲 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学文学院,湖北武汉430072 [2]山东大学儒学高等研究院,山东济南250100

出　　处：《图书馆研究与工作》2018年第9期88-92,共5页Library Science Research & Work

摘　　要：单疏本《春秋正义》具有极高的文献校勘价值,清末刘承幹嘉业堂曾据日本抄本刻十二卷,并附有《校勘记》上下卷。文章从创新、继承与不足三个方面的分析考述,认为刘氏校勘之得有六:首次以单疏本《春秋正义》校阮刻十行本;记录单疏本《春秋正义》另一传本异文;暗示单疏本《春秋正义》与阮校所据八行本之关系;未全采阮校之考订结论;赞同单疏本《春秋正义》与阮校文字相同者;即使二者不同,亦择善而从。其失亦有三:所参阮校本是后刊合刻本,而非初刻单行本;摘录阮本校记时多有错误;单疏本与阮本异文出校多有遗漏,尚不足体现单疏本蕴藏之价值。The edition of the single copy of annotation of Justice in Spring and Autumn is of great value.Liu Chenggan carved twelve volumes based on Japanese transcripts and wrote attached Collating Note I,II.The author now thinks there are 6 gains of Collating Notes after researching from the perspective of their innovation,inheritance and shortage:it is the first time for 10 volumes carved by Ruan Yuan to be proofread according to the edition of the single copy of annotation of Justice in Spring and Autumn,the Attached Notes record part of Justice in Spring and Autumn written in a different language,they suggest the relationship between the edition and Ruan’s 8 reference books,the notes do not blindly copy the conclusion made by Ruan Yuan,they affirm the same part in Ruan’s version and the edition,when there is contradiction,Liu made his choice according to the original book.There are also 3 loses of Liu’s notes:Ruan’s version,which Liu refers to,is a collected annotation published later,but not a separate edition originally carved by Ruan Yuan,there are mistakes when recording Ruan’s version,many parts are missed in both Liu and Ruan’s version,therefore the value of the edition of the single copy of annotation of Justice in Spring and Autumn cannot be present clearly.

关 键 词：刘承幹 《春秋正义》 《校勘记》 

分 类 号：G256.3[文化科学—图书馆学]