检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:方向东[1]
出 处:《中医临床研究》2018年第22期89-91,共3页Clinical Journal Of Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的:分析腰间盘突出症患者应用针灸理疗治疗的康复效果。方法:研究对象抽选2016年1月-2017年10月本院接收、治疗的118例腰间盘突出症患者,以不同治疗方法为依据分成两组:对照组(n=59例,施以传统理疗治疗),治疗组(n=59例,施以针灸理疗治疗),同时观察、比对两组患者的临床治疗效果。结果:治疗后,治疗组26例治愈,18例显效,13例好转,2例无效,治疗有效率为96.61%;对照组19例治愈,16例显效,15例好转,9例无效,治疗有效率为84.75%;两组差异比较明显(P<0.05);治疗后,治疗组疼痛程度评分为(2.74±0.26)、腰痛疾患疗效评分为(23.24±2.16)分,与对照组的(6.24±1.27)分、(15.49±3.29)分相比差异明显,P<0.05。结论:对腰间盘突出症患者展开专业治疗时,施以针灸理疗治疗的应用效果比传统理疗更有效,可大大提升临床治疗有效率,改善疼痛程度。Objective:To analyze the rehabilitation effects of acupuncture and physiotherapy on lumbar disc herniation.Methods:118 patients were divided into two groups based on different treatment methods.The control group was given traditional physiotherapy treatment;the treatment group was treated by acupuncture more.Results:After treatment,26 cases in the treatment group were cured;18 cases were markedly effective;13 cases were improved;2 cases were ineffective;and the efficiency was 96.61%.In the control group,19 cases were cured;16 cases were markedly effective;17 cases were improved;9 cases were ineffective;and the efficiency was 84.47%;the difference between two groups was significant(P<0.05).The pain score was(2.74±0.26)in the treatment group,the efficacy score of the low back pain disease was(23.24±2.16);those improvement were more significant than(6.24±1.27)and(15.49±3.29)in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:Acupuncture and physiotherapy on lumbar disc herniation is more effective,can greatly increase the efficiency,improve the degree of pain.
分 类 号:R274.34[医药卫生—中医骨伤科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112