珂罗版印刷与传统书写墨迹的比较研究  

Comparative study of collotype printing ink and traditional Chinese ink

作　　者：徐文娟[1] 裔传臻 褚昊 黄瑛[1] 沈骅[1] XU Wen-juan;YI Chuan-zhen;CHU Hao;HUANG Ying;SHEN Hua(Shanghai Museum Conservation Centre,Shanghai 200231,China)

机构地区：[1]上海博物馆文物保护科技中心,上海200231

出　　处：《文物保护与考古科学》2018年第4期80-84,共5页Sciences of Conservation and Archaeology

摘　　要：珂罗版印刷是书画文物主要复制方法之一。由于该方法复制书画真迹印刷品仿真程度高,满足了广大书画爱好者研究和收藏的需要,同时给书画真伪识别带来一定的难度。本工作通过视频显微镜、扫描电子显微镜、红外光谱、拉曼光谱等多种检测手段对珂罗版印刷油墨和传统书写墨迹进行研究。结果表明,珂罗版印刷油墨与传统油烟墨和墨汁在形貌、成分方面均存在一定的差异,从而对可疑书画印刷品的鉴别提供了科学依据。Collotype printing is one of the main replication methods for ancient calligraphy and paintings.Collotype printing can reflect original artistic features of ancient Chinese calligraphy and paintings very well.Therefore,its use can result in certain difficulties in identifying the authenticity of calligraphy and paintings at the same time.In our study,we analyzed collotype printing ink and traditional writing ink using video microscopy,scanning electron microscopy,infrared spectrometry and Raman spectrometry.The result shows that collotype printing ink and traditional Chinese ink are different in morphology and composition.This could provide a scientific basis for identification of suspected collotype prints.

关 键 词：珂罗版 墨迹 鉴别 

分 类 号：K879[历史地理—考古学及博物馆学]