论专断治疗行为的除罪化——以治疗行为正当化根据为主线  

On Criminal Theory of Arbitrary Treatment Behavior according to the Main line of Legitimation of Treat Behavior

作　　者：张健一[1] ZHANG Jian-yi(Jiangsu Police Institute)

机构地区：[1]江苏警官学院法律系

出　　处：《华中科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2018年第5期77-82,共6页Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"刑法机能视角下的故意概念与内容研究"(17YJC820067);江苏高校"青蓝工程"资助项目;"十三五"江苏省重点建设学科建设工程资助项目;江苏警官学院青年博士创新团队资助项目;江苏警官学院科学研究项目"归责体系视角下的错误论研究"(2017SJYSY08)

摘　　要："病患自决权"对"医师父权主义"的吞噬,引发了专断治疗行为是否涉嫌刑事犯罪的争论。在刑法语境内妥当回应上述争论,逻辑上以明晰治疗行为的正当化根据为前提。在肯定治疗行为符合故意伤害罪的构成要件之后,治疗行为正当化根据在违法性领域的争点表现为优越利益原理与被害人承诺说的对立。在完成了事实与价值、传统与现实、理想与技术三个侧面的检验后,优越利益原理展现出较之于被害人承诺说的妥当性。作为优越利益原理的逻辑展开,专断治疗行为不能以故意伤害罪处罚。“Patient’s right of self-determination”has consumed the concept of“physician patriarchy”.It has led to the debate on whether the arbitrary treatment behavior is a crime.In the criminal law,it is appropriate to respond to the above arguments and logically to clarify the justification of treatment behavior.With the premise of affirming the compliance of the treatment behavior with the component of intentional injury,the treatment behavior justification in the field of illegality is the opposition between the privileged interest principle and the statement of victim’s promise After the inspection of the fact and value,tradition and reality,the ideal and technology,superior interests principle shows its advantage.In conclusion,arbitrary't treatment behavior is not a crime.

关 键 词：治疗行为 知情同意 优越利益 自我决定权 被害人承诺 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]