基于CiteSpace Ⅲ的中外RDA研究比较分析  

Comparative Analysis on Chinese and Foreign RDA Research Based on CiteSpace Ⅲ

作　　者：刘诗童 聂兰渤[1] 宋晓丹[1] 

机构地区：[1]大连理工大学图书馆,辽宁大连116024

出　　处：《图书馆建设》2018年第9期27-35,共9页Library Development

基　　金：教育部高校图工委文献资源发展研究课题"高校图书馆多校区;多分馆纸质图书文献采访模式研究";项目编号:17TGW01003;大连理工大学2016年度基本科研业务费人文社科科研专题立项"数字环境下高校图书馆电子资源效用综合评价研究";项目编号:DUT16RW118的成果

摘　　要：利用信息可视化软件CiteSpaceⅢ,以CNKI、Web of Science(WoS)等5个中外数据库为数据来源,从知识基础、研究主体、研究热点3个角度对中外RDA研究成果进行比较分析后发现:中外RDA研究的相同之处在于研究主体都是国家图书馆和高校图书馆,研究热点集中在RDA与其他编目规则的比较及RDA规则的本地化方面。不同之处在于国外RDA研究的知识基础阐明了RDA的设计理由,聚焦于RDA的应用与推广,研究热点关注RDA在实际工作中遇到的问题,尝试通过改进RDA规则使其能够适用于更多种类的文献,研究主体呈现以美国为主、西方国家间合作较为紧密的态势;而国内研究则侧重RDA的引进及理论介绍,聚焦于RDA对中文编目工作的影响,研究热点更关注RDA规则在中文资源编目中的使用情况,研究主体间合作较为分散。Data in 5 databases at home and abroad,such as CNKI and Web of Science(WoS)is analyzed by information visualization software CiteSpaceⅢin aspects of knowledge base,research subject and hotspot.RDA researches at home and abroad are similar.Their research subjects are national library and university library,one of hotspots focuses on the comparison of RDA and other cataloging rules,and the localization of RDA rules.There are differences as well.RDA research abroad clarifies the rationale for RDA design in the knowledge base,focuses on the application and promotion,attaches more importance to problems encountered in the practice of job,attempts to improve RDA rules to make it applicable to more kinds of documents,and research subjects mainly include the U.S.and close cooperation among western countries.While research at home is more about introducing the theory and impact of RDA on Chinese cataloging,concerns more with the use of RDA rules in Chinese resource cataloguing,and cooperation among the subjects is more dispersed.

关 键 词：RDA 资源描述与检索 CiteSpaceⅢ 

分 类 号：G245.3[文化科学]