检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:叶晨莹 赵鹏[1] 相敏 YE Chenying;ZHAO Peng;XIANG Min(MOE Key Laboratory of Deep Underground Science and Engineering,School of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan University,Chengdu 610065,Sichuan,China)
机构地区:[1]四川大学建筑与环境学院深地科学与工程教育部重点实验室,四川成都610065
出 处:《地震工程学报》2018年第4期705-712,共8页China Earthquake Engineering Journal
基 金:国家自然科学基金青年项目(51508357);四川省科技计划应用基础项目(2015JY0278)
摘 要:针对目前RC框架结构地震易损性分析中整体损伤模型研究的薄弱性以及广泛采用的层间位移角方法不能准确反应结构在地震作用下损伤机理的现状,本文基于现有损伤模型的对比分析,提出了一种较准确反映地震破坏机理同时便于应用的最大变形和滞回耗能非线性组合的双参数损伤模型。以8层RC框架结构为例,进行50条地震波作用下的结构增量动力分析,分别绘制了变形和能量2种单参数模型以及牛荻涛模型和本文模型两种双参数模型的结构损伤曲线与易损性曲线,并进行了模型的对比分析和检验评估。分析结果表明:仅以层间位移角作为结构整体损伤指标会高估结构的抗倒塌性能,仅以能量作为结构整体损伤指标会低估结构损伤的超越概率。本文模型能较好地平衡最大变形和累积损伤对结构损伤的影响程度。The work proposes a nonlinear combination,two-parameter damage model of maximum deformation and hysteretic energy dissipation.Comparing the performance of the proposed model with that of existing damage models reveals that the proposed model can accurately reflect the earthquake damage mechanism.For comparison,the structural damage curves and seismic fragility curves of two single-parameter models(deformation and energy)and two two-parameter models(Niuditao model and the proposed model)are drawn in accordance with the incremental dynamic analysis results of an eight-story RC frame structure under the input of 50 seismic waves.Results show that structural collapse performance will be overestimated when the interstory drift angle is used as the sole structural damage index,whereas the exceedance probability of structural damage will be underrated if energy dissipation is used as the sole structural damage index.The proposed model can well balance the influence of maximum deformation and cumulative damage on structural damage.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28