国际图书情报学研究力量发展态势的可视化分析  

Data Visualization of International Trends of Library and Information Science Research

作　　者：刘虹[1] 李煜[1,2] 孙建军[1] 顾东晓[3] LIU Hong;LI Yu;SUN Jianjun;GU Dongxiao

机构地区：[1]南京大学信息管理学院 [2]西北大学图书馆 [3]合肥工业大学管理学院

出　　处：《图书馆论坛》2018年第10期66-77,共12页Library Tribune

基　　金：本文系国家自然科学基金项目“基于健康大数据的老年慢性病知识组织与知识服务机制研究”(项目编号:71771077)和江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划项目“社交网络信息传播行为与可信度研究”(项目编号:KYCX17_0017)研究成果。

摘　　要：以WoS图情领域86种核心期刊的47758篇文章为依据,获取知识产出、机构合作和作者合作大数据,采用共词分析、内容分析、科学知识图谱分析等研究方法,利用TDA、Ucinet、VOSviewer、Stata等数据分析软件,从知识产出与科研合作两个维度对近十五年国际图书情报学的研究态势展开分析。研究表明,美国在图情领域科研实力雄厚,知识产出水平与科研合作程度遥遥领先,印第安纳大学伯明顿分校、哈佛大学、北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校是知识产出总量最多的三个机构;英国、西班牙、德国等欧洲国家以及中国、加拿大是图情领域研究的中坚力量。对于我国而言,知识产出总量已进入图情领域核心国家阵列,但是在高产机构、高产作者等指标上表现不够优秀,在科研合作中的学术地位与影响力有待提升。Based on 47758 articles collected from 86 core library and information science journals from the Web of Science,this paper obtains the big data on knowledge output,institutional and author collaborations.By using the co-word analysis,content analysis and scientific knowledge graph methods and utilizing data analysis software such as TDA,Ucinet,VOSviewer and Stata,this paper analyses the international research environment of library and information science in recent fifteen years from the dimensions of knowledge output and scientific research collaboration.The research results show that the United States has strong scientific research in the field of library and information science.Its indicators of knowledge output and scientific research collaboration are far ahead of other countries.Indiana University at Bloomington,Harvard University and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill are the top three universities in terms of knowledge output.European countries such as Britain,Spain,Germany,and other countries,for example China and Canada,constitute the backbone of library and information science research.For China,the total number of related knowledge output has already been qualified as one of the leading countries.However,it does not show outstanding performance in some other indicators,such as highyielding institutions and high-yielding authors.Therefore,the Chinese academic standing and influence need to be improved.

关 键 词：学术合作 知识图谱 文献计量 核心期刊 研究趋势 

分 类 号：G353.1[文化科学—情报学] G250