未年检机动车交通事故转让人责任探析  

An Analysis on the Responsibility of Assignor of a Motor Vehicle Without Vehicle Annual Inspection in Traffic Accidents

作　　者：袁金华[1] YUAN Jin-hua(School of Law,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院,北京100872

出　　处：《东北大学学报（社会科学版）》2018年第5期513-519,共7页Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)

基　　金：北京市社会科学基金重大资助项目(15ZDA41)

摘　　要：我国法律尚未明确规定未年检机动车交通事故的转让人责任,司法实践中出现了判决以承担连带责任为主的"类案不同判"现象,导致滥科连带责任而有失公平。转让未年检车属于当事人意思自治领域,转让人无承担危险责任的理论基础。司法实践中应以适用《侵权责任法》第50条不承担责任为原则,根据受害人的举证内容,以承担连带责任和过错责任为例外,从而有效协调责任公平与受害人保护之间的平衡,维护司法公正。No clear legal regulations are available in our country at present about the responsibility of the assignor in transferring ownership of a motor vehicle without vehicle annual inspection after traffic accidents.In judicial practice,there have been“different judgments for similar cases”in which the assignor and the assignee are sentenced to bear the joint responsibilities and thus the assignor is put in an unfair situation.Transferring the motor vehicle without vehicle annual inspection belongs to the field of party autonomy.The assignor has no theoretical basis for taking dangerous liability and should be judged in principle according to Article 50 of Tort Law and held irresponsible with the exception of joint and fault liabilities based on evidence from the victim so as to balance the values of fairness and victim protection,and thus safeguard the judicial justice.

关 键 词：未年检机动车 连带责任 因果关系 过错 原因力 

分 类 号：D923.3[政治法律—民商法学]