检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭英华[1] 徐亚男 GUO Yinghua;XU Yanan(School of Law,Hohai University,Nanjing 211100,China)
出 处:《重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版)》2018年第5期48-54,共7页Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Science Edition)
摘 要:我国《民法总则》明确了网络虚拟财产受法律保护,这是财产保护的一大进步,但是理论和实践中,网络虚拟财产却存在着性质和权属难以确定、分割和继承规则不明确等一系列问题。对涉及淘宝网店财产分割的审判案例进行数据分析,发现审判实践中存在着财产分割没有法律依据、价值难确定、归属不公平的困境。针对这些困境,在对夫妻网络虚拟财产进行分割时要注意保护虚拟财产的特殊性,提前明确共同财产范围,组织多机构联合评估价值,保护人身利益。China’s“General Provisions of Civil Law”clarifies that the network virtual property is protected by law.This is a major advancement in property protection.However,in the theory and practice,the network virtual property has a series of problems,such as virtual property is difficult to determine the nature and ownership and segmentation and inheritance rules are not clear.Data analysis of the trial cases involving the property division of taobao shop found that there is no legal basis for property division,the value is difficult to determine,and the attribution is unfair.In response to these dilemmas,in the division of the virtual property,we should pay attention to the protection of the special nature of the virtual property,clarify the scope of the common property in advance,organize multiple agencies to jointly assess the value,and protect personal interests.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.142.242.51