检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑洁[1] 俞益武[1] 包亚芳 ZHENG Jie;YU Yiwu;BAO Yafang(School of Landscape Architecture,Zhejiang A&F University,Hangzhou 311300,Zhejiang,China)
出 处:《浙江农林大学学报》2018年第5期919-926,共8页Journal of Zhejiang A&F University
基 金:杭州市临安区生态养生旅游产业发展研究规划项目(20150701)
摘 要:以浙江省杭州市4家疗养院为研究对象,基于层次分析法(AHP法)从康复景观空间多样化、康体设施人性化、道路交通便捷性、软质康复景观丰富度、人体感知舒适性5个评价目标和24个评价因子,构建疗养院康复景观环境评价指标体系;结合语义分析法(SD法)对康复景观环境的主观评价结果进行调查分析。结果表明:杭州4家疗养院康复景观综合评分从大到小排序为陆军杭州疗养院(0.737),空军疗养院(0.712),望江山疗养院(0.622),中国兵器装备集团杭州疗养院(0.601),并针对评价目标分别提出康复景观优化建议。This study took four sanatoriums in Hangzhou as the research objects and used analytic hierarchy process(AHP)method to construct the evaluation index system of therapeutic landscape environment in sanatoriums.The index system aimed to evaluate 5 objectives including the variety of therapeutic landscape space,the humanization of recreational facilities,the convenience of road traffic,the richness of plant therapeutic landscape and the human perception,with 24 evaluation factors.Then the study analyzed the subjective evaluation results of rehabilitation landscape environment with semantic differential(SD)method.The results showed that the comprehensive grading of therapeutic landscape in four sanatoriums was as follows:Army Sanatorium(0.737),Air Sanatorium(0.712),Wang Jiangshan Sanatorium(0.622)and Weapon Group Sanatorium(0.601).This study proposed the rehabilitation landscape optimization suggestions for the evaluation objective.
关 键 词:景观生态学 康复景观 疗养院 层次分析法(AHP法) 语义分析法(SD法) 评价指标 杭州
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.182