检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高凌晞 GAO Ling-xi(School of Law,Nankai University,Tianjin 300350,China)
机构地区:[1]南开大学法学院,天津300350
出 处:《天津商业大学学报》2018年第5期68-73,共6页Journal of Tianjin University of Commerce
摘 要:《民法总则》语境下的个人信息权是一种兼具精神性利益与财产性利益的具体人格权,如何解决其与信息财产权和隐私权之间的关系对今后司法实践中的适用至关重要。此外,对个人信息的私法保护不能仅限于《民法总则》第111条的原则性规定,一方面应扩张个人信息权的内涵,另一方面,还应通过《侵权责任法》以及未来或将制定的人格权法来共同构建完整的个人信息权私法保护体系。The personal information right in the context of“the General Provisions of the Civil Law”is a kind of specific personality right with both spiritual and property interests.How to solve the relationship between personal informa-tion right and information property right and right of privacy is of great importance to the application to judicial practice in the future.In addition,the private law protection of personal information shouldn’t only be embodied in the principle of Article 111 of“the General Provisions of the Civil Law”.On one hand,it’s necessary to expand the connotation of personal information right.On the other hand,it’s important to jointly build a complete private law protection system of personal information right by means of“the Tort Liability Law”and the future personality right law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.185