检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:葛成[1] 沈铭辉[1] GE Cheng;SHEN Ming-hui
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院亚太与全球战略研究院
出 处:《云南社会科学》2018年第5期43-51,186,共10页Social Sciences in Yunnan
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目"后全球金融危机时期新兴经济体国家风险形成机制研究"(项目号:15BGJ033)的阶段性成果
摘 要:美国总统特朗普执政以来,秉持美国优先的现实主义原则,重拾"印太战略"以应对中国崛起。同一时期,印度出于平衡"一带一路"倡议与中国影响力需要,对印太概念采取迎合姿态,美印两国在印太框架下的合作已成为现实。然而,美印两国的战略目标大相径庭,两国与中国的博弈难以形成合力,且美国优先与"印太战略"对资源投入的要求存在矛盾,制约了美印合作的空间。对中国来说,通过加强互信化解对抗思维,加强中印基础设施与金融合作拉近两国距离,并通过区域经济一体化安排抗衡逆全球化思潮,可以有效抵消"印太战略"的潜在遏制举动与围堵意图。Since president Trump took office,Indo-Pacific strategy is revisited,complying with America First realism principle,to cope with China's rise.At the same time,to balance"The Belt and Road"initiative and China's influence,India accepted Indo-Pacific concept.Cooperation between India and US under Indo-Pacific framework is a reality.However,due to differences in strategic objectives,the strategic games between the two countries and China respectively are difficult to form a joint force.A clear contradiction between America First principle and the demand of resource input toward Indo-Pacific strategy,fundamentally restrict the space of Cooperation.For China,strengthening mutual trust can dissolve antagonism,China-Indian infrastructure and financial cooperation will bind two countries closer,and countering the trend of anti-globalization through regional economic integration,will effectively counteract the action as well as intention of containment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.68