检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:纳扎尔.纳斯肉拉 吐尔孙塔依.吐尔汗 Nazar·Nathra;Tursunta·Turhan(Department of Orthopaedics,Xinhua Hospital,Yili,Xinjiang,835000 China)
机构地区:[1]新疆伊犁州新华医院骨一科,新疆伊犁835000
出 处:《中外医疗》2018年第23期58-59,62,共3页China & Foreign Medical Treatment
摘 要:目的探讨高龄胸椎结核运用前路和后路手术治疗的临床对比。方法方便选择2016年1月—2018年1月高龄胸椎结核患者45例,据术式分组。对照组22例开展前路手术治疗,观察组23例行后路手术治疗。比较两组高龄胸椎结核治疗效果;手术耗时、切口、出血、住院耗时;手术后患者生存质量QOL评分、神经功能等级的改善幅度;气胸、肺部感染、伤口延迟愈合等的发生率情况。结果观察组高龄胸椎结核治疗效果100.00%高于对照组72.73%(χ~2=6.033,P<0.05)。手术后观察组生存质量QOL评分、神经功能等级改善幅度(45.13±5.24)分、(2.02±0.21)级大于对照组(30.11±2.21)分、(1.01±0.22)级(t=5.822、6.012,P<0.05)。观察组住院耗时(13.14±0.24)d短于对照组(21.14±2.24)d,(t=8.012,P<0.05)。观察组气胸、肺部感染、伤口延迟愈合等的发生率少于对照组(χ~2=7.033,P<0.05)。结论高龄胸椎结核患者行后路手术疗效肯定,效果优于前路手术,可更好减少并发症,恢复神经功能和改善生活质量,可早期出院。Objective To explore the clinical comparison of anterior and posterior surgical treatment for tuberculosis of the elderly.Methods 45 patients with thoracic spinal tuberculosis from January 2016 to January 2018 were selected conveniently according to surgical method.22 patients in the control group underwent anterior surgery and 23 patients in the observation group underwent posterior surgery.Compare the treatment effects of two groups of old age thoracic tuberculosis;time-consuming operation,incision,hemorrhage,and hospitalization time;QOL score of quality of life of patients after surgery;improvement degree of neurological function;incidence rate of pneumothorax,lung infection,delayed wound healing,etc.Results The treatment effect of tuberculosis tuberculosis in the observation group was 100.00%higher than that in the control group 72.73%,(χ2=6.033,P<0.05).After surgery,QOL scores of the quality of life of the observation group and the degree of improvement of the neurological function grade were(45.13±5.24)points and(2.02±0.21)grades were greater than the control group(30.11±2.21)points and(1.01±0.22)grades,(t=5.822,6.012,P<0.05).The hospitalization time of the observation group was(13.14±0.24)days shorter than that of the control group(21.14±2.24)days,(t=8.012,P<0.05).The incidence of pneumothorax,lung infection,delayed wound healing in the observation group was less than the control group(χ2=7.033,P<0.05).Conclusion The efficacy of posterior approach for tuberculosis in elderly patients with thoracic vertebral tuberculosis is affirmative.The effect is better than that of the anterior approach.It can reduce complications,restore nerve function and improve the quality of life,and can be discharged early.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249