出 处:《中国药房》2018年第18期2532-2536,共5页China Pharmacy
基 金:四川省卫生和计划生育委员会科研课题(No.18PJ164)
摘 要:目的:比较不同浓度布比卡因超声引导下行腹横肌平面阻滞(TAPB)对阑尾切除患者术后相关指标的影响及安全性。方法:选择2017年3月-2018年3月我院收治的120例阑尾炎患者,按随机数字表法分为A、B、C、D组,每组各30例。所有患者手术结束即开始行超声引导下TAPB,A组患者注射0.35%布比卡因20 m L,B组患者注射0.25%布比卡因20 m L,C组患者注射0.15%布比卡因20 m L,D组患者注射0.9%氯化钠注射液20 m L,后均行静脉自控镇痛。观察4组患者行超声引导下TAPB后2 h(T_1)、4h(T_2)、8 h(T_3)、12 h(T_4)、24 h(T_5)、48 h(T_6)时在静息和咳嗽状态下的疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS),术后镇痛满意度,曲马多使用率和镇痛泵按压次数,肛门排气时间和下床时间及不良反应发生情况。结果:T_2~T_5时,4组患者静息状态下的VAS评分均显著高于同组T_1、T_6时,并在T_3时达到最高值,随后逐渐降低,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),T_1与T_6时比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);T_1~T_6时,A、B、C组患者的VAS评分均显著低于D组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),但A、B、C组间比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。T_2~T_4时,4组患者咳嗽状态下的VAS评分均显著高于同组T_1时,并在T_3、T_4时达到最高值(D组为T_4时),而在T_5~T_6时均显著低于同组T_1时;T_1~T_6时,A、B、C组患者的VAS评分均显著低于D组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),但A、B、C组间比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A、B、C组患者术后镇痛满意度评分、镇痛满意度优的例数均显著高于或多于D组,曲马多使用率、镇痛泵按压次数均显著低于或少于D组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),但A、B、C组间比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。4组患者肛门排气时间、下床时间及恶心呕吐、眩晕、瘙痒、尿潴留的发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),且所有患者均未发生局部麻醉药相关的毒性反应。结论:阑尾切除术后�OBJECTIVE:To compare effects and safety of ultrasound-guided transabdominis plane block(TAPB)of different concentrations of bupivacaine on related indexes in patients after appendectomy.METHODS:Totally 120 appendicitis patients selected from our hospital during Mar.2017-Mar.2018 were randomly divided into group A,B,C,D,with 30 cases in each group.All patients received ultrasound-guided TAPB immediately after surgery.Group A was given 0.35%bupivacaine 20 mL intravenously;group B was given 0.25%bupivacaine 20 mL intravenously;group C was given 0.15%bupivacaine 20 mL intravenously;group D was given 0.9%Sodium chloride injection 20 mL intravenously,and then given patient controlled intravenous analgesia.The VAS scores of 4 groups in resting and cough state were recorded at 2 h(T1),4 h(T2),8 h(T3),12 h(T4),24 h(T5),48 h(T6)after ultrasound-guided TAPB.Satisfaction degree of postoperative analgesia,the rate of tramadol use,press times of analgesic pump,anal exhaust time,the time of getting out of bed and the occurrence of ADR were observed in 4 groups.RESULTS:At T2-T5,VAS scores of 4 groups in resting were significantly lower than same group at T1 and T6;at T3,VAS scores reached the highest value and then decreased gradually,with statistical significance(P<0.05);there was no statistical significance at T1 and T6(P>0.05).At T1-T6,VAS scores of group A,B and C were significantly lower than group D,with statistical significance(P<0.05);there was no statistical significance among group A,B and C(P>0.05).At T2-T4,VAS scores of 4 groups in cough state were significantly higher than same group at T1;at T3 and T4,VAS scores reached the highest value(group D at T4),at T5-T6,VAS scores were lower than same group at T1;at T1-T6,VAS scores of group A,B and C were significantly lower than group D,with statistical significance(P<0.05),but there was no statistical significance among group A,B and C(P>0.05).The score of analgesia satisfaction degree and the case number excellent analgesia satisfaction degree in group A,B and C were si
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...