检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐丹慧[1] 刘晓[2] 陈夏容[3] 李六亿[1] XU Dan-hui;LIU Xiao;CHEN Xia-rong;LI Liu-yi(Peking University First Hospital,Beijing 100034,China;Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University,Shijiazhuang 050011,China;The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University,Quanzhou 362000,China)
机构地区:[1]北京大学第一医院,北京100034 [2]河北医科大学第四医院,河北石家庄050011 [3]福建医科大学附属第二医院,福建泉州362000
出 处:《中国感染控制杂志》2018年第10期872-877,共6页Chinese Journal of Infection Control
基 金:中国医院协会中国医院感染管理工作30周年总结项目(CHA-2016-026-053)
摘 要:目的尝试在直接观察法的基础上设计隐蔽式调查方案控制偏倚,以真实地评估医院医务人员手卫生依从性。方法 2016年6月对北京市8所综合性医院医务人员手卫生依从性进行隐蔽式调查,获取手卫生依从性及正确性的数据,对数据进行统计、直接标化,并与2015年通过直接观察法所获得的手卫生监测数据进行比较。结果 2016年医院医务人员手卫生依从率为58.04%,正确率为88.68%。经直接标化后,ICU手卫生依从率最高(81.29%),急诊科手卫生正确率最高(93.29%),神经内科手卫生依从率及正确率均最低(42.97%和82.35%);护士手卫生依从率及正确率均最高(69.02%和92.84%),保洁员手卫生依从率及正确率均最低(37.25%和71.59%);接触患者后手卫生依从率最高(71.79%)、正确率最低(88.76%),清洁/无菌操作前手卫生依从率最低(43.08%)、正确率最高(93.50%)。隐蔽式调查法所获得医务人员手卫生依从率均低于直接观察法(均P<0.05),正确率的差异程度不同。结论手卫生依从性在科室、人员、指征的分布中存在差异,需加强对手卫生重点环节的干预。采用普通直接观察法对手卫生依从性的调查结果存在一定的偏倚,手卫生调查方法有待完善。Objective To design a concealed investigation scheme to control bias based on direct observation me-thod,evaluate actual hand hygiene(HH)compliance among health care workers(HCWs).Methods HH compliance among HCWs in 8 general hospitals in Beijing was performed concealed investigation in June 2016,data of HH compliance and correctness were obtained and conducted statistical analysis as well as direct standardization,then compared with HH surveillance data obtained by direct observation method in 2015.Results In 2016,HCWs’HH compliance rate and correct rate were 58.04%and 88.68%respectively.After direct standardization,ICU had the highest HH compliance rate(81.29%),emergency department had the highest HH correct rate(93.29%),neurology department had the lowest compliance rate and correct rate of HH(42.97%and 82.35%respectively);nurses had the highest compliance rate and correct rate of HH(69.02%and 92.84%respectively),cleaners had the lowest compliance rate and correct rate of HH(37.25%and 71.59%respectively);compliance rate of HH after contacting patients was the highest(71.79%)but correct rate was the lowest(88.76%),compliance rate of HH before cleaning/aseptic procedure was the lowest(43.08%)but the correct rate was the highest(93.50%).HH compliance rate of HCWs investigated by concealed method was lower than that by direct observation(P<0.05),and the extent of discrepancy in correctness was different.Conclusion HH compliance is different in the distribution of departments,personnel,and indication,it is necessary to strengthen intervention in key aspects of HH.There is a certain bias in results of direct observation on HH compliance,HH investigation methods need to be improved.
分 类 号:R197.323[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.140.248.104