检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王金龙[1] 许杨帆[2] Wang Jinlong;Xu Yangfan(the First Chinese Historical Archive,Beijing 100031;Beijing Polytechnic College,Beijing 100042)
机构地区:[1]中国第一历史档案馆利用处,北京100031 [2]北京工业职业技术学院思政部,北京100042
出 处:《宁夏社会科学》2018年第5期197-207,共11页NingXia Social Sciences
摘 要:乾隆《宁夏府志》和民国《朔方道志》集中记载了清代宁夏府进士情况,但将2部方志所载清代宁夏府进士情况与中国第一历史档案馆所藏清代进士登科录、小金榜等原始科举档案进行比较,发现《宁夏府志》和《朔方道志》对清代宁夏府进士的记载存在缺载、误载等问题。用进士登科录、小金榜、清代官员履历等档案对《乾隆府志》和《朔方道志》所记清代宁夏府进士进行考补,清代宁夏府共考中进士162人,其中文进士42人,武进士120人。The situation about Jinshi in Ningxiafu during the Qianlong period had been recorded in Qianlong Ningxiafu Chronicles and Shuofangdao Chronicles.However,the records are different from the original files such as Jinshi Entry Lists and Little Jinbang stored in the First Chinese Historical Archive.Comparing those records we have found there were something lacked and wrong.We had made textual research and supplement on Ningxiafu Chronicles and Shuofangdao Chronicles using Jinshi Entry Lists,Little Jinbang and the officials’personal details in the Qing Dynasty to confirm there were 162 Jinshi incliding 42 literary Jinshi and 120 martial Jinshi.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.44