反腐败机构的模式比较及其启示  

Comparative Analysis of the Model of Anti-corruption Institutions and Its Reference

作　　者：吕永祥[1] 王立峰[1,2] Lv Yongxiang;Wang Lifeng

机构地区：[1]吉林大学行政学院 [2]吉林大学廉政教育与研究中心

出　　处：《中州学刊》2018年第9期6-11,共6页Academic Journal of Zhongzhou

基　　金：教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目"坚持依法治国与制度治党;依规治党统筹推进研究"(17JZD003);吉林大学廉政智库建设项目"中国特色‘猎狐’行动的国际合作机制研究"(2017LZZKY006);中央高校基本科研业务费项目"国际刑法的范式研究"(2015ZZ030)

摘　　要：成立监察委员会是应对腐败问题的一种制度创新和组织创新,监察委员会的机构设置及其制度设计直接影响腐败治理的成效。反腐败机构有单一机构模式和多机构模式两种主要类型。保障反腐败机构的独立性、专业性、充分性和廉洁性是很多国家和地区反腐败的共同经验。借鉴有关国家和地区的反腐败机构模式,我国可以从增强监察委员会的相对独立性、提高监察委员会成员的专业化程度、赋予监察委员会充分的反腐败职权和健全针对监察委员会的全方位监督机制四个方面推动监察委员会制度不断完善。The establishment of the supervisory committee is a kind of institutional innovation and organizational innovation to deal with corruption.The institutional setup of the supervisory committee and its institutional design directly affect the effectiveness of corruption control.There are two main types of anti-corruption agencies:single agency mode and multi agency mode.Guaranteeing the independence,professionalism,adequacy and integrity of anti-corruption institutions is the common experience of many countries and regions in anti-corruption.In view of this,taking the successful experience of anti-corruption organizations in relevant countries and regions,China can promote the system of the supervisory committee from four aspects:strengthening the relative independence of the the supervisory committee,improving the professionalization of its members,giving the supervision committee full anti-corruption powers and improving the comprehensive supervision mechanism of the supervision committee.

关 键 词：监察委员会 反腐败机构 单一机构模式 多机构模式 

分 类 号：D262[政治法律—政治学]