检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:侯丽[1] 于璐 牛瑶[1] 张媛 王亮[1] HOU Li;YU Lu;NIU Yao;ZHANG Yuan;WANG Liang(Department of Clinical Laboratory,the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University,Urumqi 830054,Xinjiang,China;Department of Clinical Laboratory,Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University,Urumqi 830000,Xinjiang,China;Department of Clinical Laboratory the Second People's Hospital of Kashi of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region,Kashi 844000,Xinjiang,China)
机构地区:[1]新疆医科大学第一附属医院医学检验中心,新疆乌鲁木齐830054 [2]新疆医科大学附属肿瘤医院检验科,新疆乌鲁木齐830000 [3]新疆维吾尔自治区喀什地区第二人民医院检验科,新疆喀什844000
出 处:《检验医学》2018年第10期888-893,共6页Laboratory Medicine
基 金:新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金资助项目(2016D01C293)
摘 要:目的用非创伤性指标建立慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者肝纤维化诊断模型,并评价建立的模型的诊断价值。方法检测270例行肝脏组织病理学检查的CHB患者的肝纤维化血清学标志物[血小板(PLT)、丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)、天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)、γ-谷氨酰基转移酶(GGT)、碱性磷酸酶(ALP)、总胆红素(TB)、白蛋白(Alb)、白蛋白/球蛋白(A/G)比值、红细胞分布宽度(RDW)、凝血酶原活动度(PTA)、纤维蛋白原(Fib)、乙型肝炎病毒e抗原(HBeAg)]水平。分析这些检测指标与CHB患者肝纤维化的相关性。采用Logistic回归分析建立诊断模型,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析其诊断价值,并与已建立的诊断模型(APRI、FIB-4、AAR、GPR、RPR)进行比较。结果通过Logistic回归分析逐一分析各项指标,得出回归方程建立新的诊断模型AFPPR:AFPPR=1/[1+EXP(-2.584-A/G比值×1.426-PLT×0.013-PTA×0.016-Fib×0.605+RDW×0.364)]。ROC曲线分析显示,AFPPR诊断显著肝纤维化的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.80,明显大于其他5个诊断模型的AUC(P<0.01),AAR对于显著肝纤维化及严重肝纤维化基本无诊断价值(P>0.05);AFPPR诊断严重肝纤维化的AUC为0.76,与其他5个模型的AUC比较,除AAR模型(P=0.000)外,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论建立的AFPPR诊断模型可用于诊断CHB患者的显著肝纤维化,可作为临床动态监测肝纤维化的补充性证据。Objective To establish the noninvasive diagnostic model for liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B(CHB),and to investigate the role for diagnosis.Methods Serum liver fibrosis markers[platelet(PLT),alanine aminotransferase(ALT),aspartate aminotransferase(AST),gamma-glutamyltransferase(GGT),alkaline phosphatase(ALP),total bilirubin(TB),albumin(Alb),albumin to globulin(A/G)ratio,red blood cell distribution width(RDW),prothrombin time activity(PTA),fibrinogen(Fib)and hepatitis B e antigen(HBeAg)]were determined in 270 patients with CHB undergoing liver biopsy.The correlation between these indices and liver fibrosis stage of CHB patients was analyzed.Logistic regression analysis was performed to establish a diagnostic model,and the results were analyzed by receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve and compared with established diagnostic models(APRI,FIB-4,AAR,GPR and RPR).Results By Logistic regression analysis,the indices were analyzed,and the regression equation for new diagnostic model AFPPR,which was AFPPR=1/[1+EXP(-2.584-A/G ratio×1.426-PLT×0.013-PTA×0.016-Fib×0.605+RDW×0.364)],was set up.The area under curve(AUC)of AFPPR for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis was 0.80,which was bigger than those of the other 5 diagnostic models(P<0.01).AAR had no diagnostic value for significant and severe liver fibrosio(P>0.05).The AUC of AFPPR for severe liver fibrosis was 0.76,which was bigger than those of the other 5 diagnostic models.Compared with the AUC of the other 5 diagnostic models,there was no statistical significance,except for AAR(P=0.000).Conclusions The established AFPPR diagnostic model for liver fibrosis can be used as clinical supplementary reference on the dynamic observation of liver fibrosis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.16.56.30