国际单项体育联合会善治评价体系构建及其实证研究  

Good Governance Evaluation System in International Sports Federations:an Empirical Study

作　　者：阿诺特.赫拉尔特 任慧涛[2] ARNOUT Geeraerd;REN Hui-tao2(trans.)(University of Leuven,Leuven 3000,Belgium;Quanzhou Normal University,Quanzhou 362000,China)

机构地区：[1]鲁汶大学 [2]泉州师范学院体育学院,福建泉州362000

出　　处：《体育学研究》2018年第1期30-40,共11页Journal of Sports Research

基　　金：国家社科重点项目"国际体育治理改革与中国体育治理现代化研究"(14AZD086)

摘　　要：基于治理理论和委托—代理模型,本研究以35个国际单项体育联合会善治评价为对象,设计了以透明度、程序民主、制衡、团结等维度作为关键维度的指标体系,并使用文献资料法、问卷调查法和访谈法等方法,对数据进行搜集整理。研究发现,国际单项体育联合会平均得分为45.5(满分100),善治状况评价为"一般",决策和工作机制不透明、选举和工作程序失范、利益相关者参与不足等,导致组织内部投机主义盛行,国际单项体育联合会合法性面临危机。研究建议:1)严格执行选举程序,健全主席和高管资格审查机制;2)完善信息公开制度,提升组织透明度;3)规范工作流程,充实组织行政程序正当性;4)多元主体参与,健全组织内外部审查制度;5)明确最长任期,保证组织官员积极性。Based on governance theory and principal-agent model,this study try to evaluate the good governance of 35 international sports federations and designs the index system based on the key dimensions of transparency,democratic process,checks and balances,solidarity.By using the literature,questionnaires and interviews,and other methods,the study found that the international federation of sports scores averaged at 45.5(out of 100),the evaluation of good governance in international sports federations is“Moderate”.the lack of decision-making and working mechanism,lack of election and work procedures,and insufficient participation of stakeholders led the international sports federation have legitimacy crisis.The study demonstrates that:1)improve the chairmanship and senior management qualification mechanism;2)improve the information disclosure system to enhance the transparency of the organization;3)standardize work processes,enrich international sports federations procedural legitimacy;4)multiple subjects to participate in,improve the system of internal and external censorship;5)define the maximum term of president,ensure the enthusiasm of leaders.

关 键 词：国际单项体育联合会 治理评价 善治评价 体育治理 体育善治 

分 类 号：G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]