南海仲裁案视角下的国际司法:扩张性、局限性及中国参与  

International Jurisdiction in the Perspective of the Arbitration on the South China Sea:Expansion,Limitation and China's Participation

作　　者：曹兴国 CAO Xingguo(China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China)

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学,北京100088

出　　处：《太平洋学报》2018年第10期9-20,共12页Pacific Journal

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“中国海权发展模式及海洋法制完善研究”(17ZDA145)、中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目“‘一带一路’投资争端解决机制构建研究”(2018M631698)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：南海仲裁案是检视国际司法当代发展和现实效果的一个典型素材。国际司法机构、实践的增加以及国际司法程序的强制适用是国际司法当代扩张的表现,体现国际争端解决机制由"权力导向"向"规则导向"的转变。但司法依据的不完备、司法机制的西方倾向以及司法过程的政治干预使得国际司法的权威性和公信力尚未全面树立。我国既要认可国际司法相对于传统争端解决方式的优势及其背后的制度性权力价值,也要注意到现有国际司法机制的局限性及其带来的风险。在此基础上,我国当前区分参与国际司法的选择具有合理性,应在渐进思路下,通过参与国际司法的改革进程以及推进"一带一路"争端解决机制和机构的构建,提升我国的国际司法能力。The arbitration on the South China Sea is a typical case to review the development and influence of international jurisdiction.The increase of judicial institutions and practices,as well as the mandatory application of judicial procedures manifests the expansion of international jurisdiction,reflecting the transition of international dispute settlement mechanism from power-oriented to rule-oriented.However,the authority and credibility of international jurisdiction are not fully established due to the imperfection of international law,western leanings of its system and political intervention in the judicial process.For China,the advantages and values of international jurisdiction shall be recognized on one hand,and on the other hand,its limitations and potential risks should also be aware.Furthermore,it is reasonable for China to continue the practice of differentiated participation in the near future.Meanwhile,China shall participate in the reform progress of international jurisdiction,as well as establish the dispute settlement mechanism and institutions of the Belt and Road Initiative,for the purpose of promoting the ability to participate in and lead the international jurisdiction.

关 键 词：国际司法 扩张性 局限性 区分参与 能力培养 

分 类 号：D990[政治法律—国际法学]