论红四方面军1932年西征与红军长征之关系  

On the Relationship between the Western Expedition and the Long March of the Red Army in 1932

作　　者：田青刚[1] TIAN Qinggang(Institute of Dabie Mountain Red Resources and Cultural Development,Xinyang Normal University,Xinyang 464000,China)

机构地区：[1]信阳师范学院大别山红色资源与文化发展研究院,河南信阳464000

出　　处：《信阳师范学院学报（哲学社会科学版）》2018年第6期136-140,共5页Journal of Xinyang Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：河南省哲学社会科学规划项目(2016BDJ007);河南省教育厅人文社科项目(2011-ZX-245)

摘　　要：关于红四方面军1932年西征,学术界研究较少。在已有成果中,官方的描述多注重于梳理其与张国焘错误路线之间的关系,学术界受此影响,对红四方面军撤离鄂豫皖根据地的责任归属,谁是谁非关注较多,忽视了对这次西征实际影响特别是其积极意义的研究。文章从此次西征与红军长征之关系的视角对西征行动进行考察,认为红四方面军1932年的西征是有重要历史贡献的:它是红军长征的重要组成部分;它是战略转移理论的成功实践;它在红军长征确定落脚方向上发挥了重要启示作用;它策应和支持了其他红军部队的长征。Regarding the Red Fourth Army's western expedition in 1932,there is less research in the academic community.Among the achievements,the official description focused more on combing out the relationship between the western expedition and Zhang Guotao's wrong route.Affected by this,the academic community pays more attention to the responsibility for the Red Fourth Army withdrew from the Hubei,Henan,and Anhui base areas,while less attention to the objective impact of this western levy,especially its positive significance.From the perspective of the relationship between the western expedition and the long march of the Red Army,this paper investigates the western expedition,and considers that the western expedition of the red fourth army in 1932 was an important historical contribution:it was an important part of the Red Army's long march;it is a successful practice of strategic transfer theory;it played an important role in the long march of the Red Army;and it responded to and supported the Long March of other Red Army troops.

关 键 词：红四方面军 1932年 西征 长征 

分 类 号：K269.4[历史地理—历史学]