“不应得为”条背后的礼法共识——论中国古代法律文本中的泛论条款  

Ritual Law Consensus behind the Article of “Doing What Ought Not To Be Done”——On the General Terms in Chinese Ancient Legal Texts

作　　者：靳匡宇 丁净玉 Jin Kuangyu;Ding Jingyu(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200050,China;People’s Intermediate Court in Nantong,Nantong 361000,China)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学 [2]南通市中级人民法院

出　　处：《北华大学学报（社会科学版）》2018年第6期78-86,共9页Journal of Beihua University(Social Sciences)

摘　　要：作为一项呈现强烈人治色彩的条文,"不应得为"条在强烈批评之中存在了两千年之久。在发生学上,法学世界观的孕育、法律群体的共同意识,变动不居的社会实践以及对制定法功能的警惕,支撑着"不应得为"条款的制度实践。在注重权利保护的现代社会,人们生活在法律丛林之中,规制无处不在,然而人们却开始期待一种"无需法律的秩序",根源在于法的创制者缺少必要的共识塑造。在法律不确定性凸显的当下,司法越发倾向于策略性和治理性,部分法律适用的开放性在实质上并不亚于传统的"不应得为"条款,归正其法治走向,通过对话和解释寻求最低共识愈加显得必要。As a clause that has a strong rule of human governing,the article of“doing what ought not to be done”has existed for more than two thousand years under the background of strong criticism.From the perspective of genetic,the gestation of the legal world view,the common consciousness of the legal community,the changing social practice,and the vigilance of the statutory function support the institutional practice of“doing what ought not to be done”provisions.In a modern society focused on rights protection,people live in the legal jungle and regulation is everywhere.However,people begin to expect an“order without law”.The root cause lies in the lack of consensus shaping behind many laws and regulations.When the legal uncertainty is consciously discovered,the strategy and governance of the judiciary become more prominent.The ambiguity and openness of the application of some laws are no less substantive than the traditional“doing what ought not to be done”clause.Going forward,dialogue and interpretation become more and more necessary.Finding a minimum consensus through dialogue and consultation mechanisms may be a breakthrough way.

关 键 词：不应得为 非正式制度 礼法共识 

分 类 号：D911.02[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]