检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:段明学 Duan Mingxue(The First Branch of Chongqing Municipal People’s Procuratorate,Chongqing 401147,China)
出 处:《辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报》2018年第5期22-26,共5页Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice
基 金:重庆市人民检察院2017年度重大课题"检察官办案主体地位研究"(课题编号:CQJCY2017A02)的阶段性研究成果
摘 要:检察官法庭上的言论自由权,是检察官办案主体地位的体现,旨在平衡检察一体制的负面效果。法国、德国、意大利等国检察官在法庭上均享有言论自由权,有权独立地发表出庭公诉意见。我国检察官在法庭上尚无言论自由权,这不利于确立检察官办案主体地位;不利于提升检察官的素质与能力。为此,有必要借鉴其它国家的做法,赋予检察官法庭上一定的、有限制的言论自由权,以更好地维护司法公正。The prosecutor’s right to freedom of speech in court is the embodiment of the prosecutor’s main position in handling the case.The purpose is to balance the negative effects of the prosecutorial system.Prosecutors in France,Germany,Italy and other countries have the right to freedom of speech in court and have the right to independently issue opinions in court.China’s prosecutors have no right to freedom of speech in court,which is not conducive to establishing the prosecutor’s main position,and is not conducive to improving the quality and ability of prosecutors.It is necessary to learn from the practices of other countries and give the prosecutor a certain and limited right to freedom of speech in order to better safeguard judicial justice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.205