检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李明 杨清华[3] 赵杰臣 孙晓宇[2] 田忠翔[2] 沈辉[2] 郝光华[2] 李春花 张林[2] Li Ming;Yang Qinghua;Zhao Jiechen;Sun Xiaoyu;Tian Zhongxiang;Shen Hui;Hao Guanghua;Li Chunhua;Zhang Lin(College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences,Ocean University of China,Qingdao 266100,China;National Marine Environmental Forecasting Center,Beijing 100081,China;Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Climate Change and Natural Disaster Studies,School of Atmosphere Sciences,Sun Yat-sen University,Zhuhai 519082,China)
机构地区:[1]中国海洋大学海洋与大气学院,山东青岛266100 [2]国家海洋环境预报中心,北京100081 [3]中山大学大气科学学院广东省气候变化与自然灾害研究重点实验室,广东珠海519082
出 处:《海洋学报》2018年第11期46-53,共8页
基 金:国家重点研发计划课题(2018YFC1407205);国家自然科学基金项目(41376188)
摘 要:本文系统地评估了国家海洋环境预报中心于我国第七次北极科学考察期间开展的北极海冰密集度数值预报结果。该预报系统基于麻省理工大学通用环流模式,并采用牛顿松弛逼近(Nudging)资料同化方法,计算输出未来1~5 d的北极海冰密集度预报产品。本文将数值预报结果同卫星观测的海冰密集度、再分析资料和"雪龙"号第七次北极考察期间观测的海冰密集度数据进行了对比分析。结果表明,预报的北极海冰密集度小于卫星观测值,24 h、72 h和120 h预报结果的偏差分别为-2.7%、-3.1%和-3.2%;数值产品的预报技巧好于气候态结果和惯性预报,但是在海冰出现快速融化或冻结时,基于Nudging同化的数值预报技巧仍有不足。另外,相比船测数据,数值预报结果在海冰边缘区的偏差相对较大,24 h、72 h和120 h预报结果的偏差分别为8.8%、12.0%和14.5%。In this study,we evaluated the 24-120 h Arctic sea ice concentration forecasts provided by National Marine Environmental Forecasting Center during the 7th Chinese National Arctic Research Expedition(CHINARE 2016).The Arctic sea ice forecast system was based on the MIT general circulation model(MITgcm)ice-ocean coupled model with Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer 2(AMSR2)sea ice concentration data Nudged.We compared the numerical forecast products with the satellite data,reanalysis data and ship-based in situ sea ice concentration observations during CHINARE 2016.It was shown that the Arctic sea ice concentration forecasts were smaller than the satellite data.The mean biases between 24 h,72 h,120 h forecasts and satellite data were-2.7%,-3.1%and-3.2%.The numerical sea ice concentration forecasts were better than the climatological means and the inertial forecasts.But the forecast skill was required to improve when the Arctic sea ice had surged rapid melting or freezing.Moreover,the forecast biases were larger compared with ship in situ observations in the marginal ice zone.The mean biases between 24 h,72 h,120 h forecasts and ship in situ data were 8.8%,12.0%and 14.5%.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30