小金胶囊与口服抗生素在治疗慢性盆腔痛疗效的比较  

Comparison of the curative effect of Xiaojin capsule and oral antibiotic in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain after pelvic inflammation

作　　者：王炎[1] 蔡淑华 

机构地区：[1]上海市徐家汇街道社区卫生服务中心,上海200023

出　　处：《中医临床研究》2018年第27期20-21,共2页Clinical Journal Of Chinese Medicine

摘　　要：目的:观察小金胶囊与口服抗生素在治疗盆腔炎后慢性盆腔痛的疗效比较。方法:将150例盆腔炎后遗症患者随机分为两组,治疗组90例给予小金胶囊口服,4周为1个疗程;对照组给予头孢克洛胶囊加甲硝唑口服,疗程2周。对两组的治愈率、总有效率进行比较。结果:治疗组治愈率、总有效率分别为90.0%、96.7%,对照组66.7%、85.0%,治疗组的治愈率、总有效率明显高于对照组(P <0.05)。结论:小金胶囊治疗慢性盆腔痛效果明显优于口服抗生素,值得推广。Objective:To observe the comparison of the curative effect of Xiaojin capsule and oral antibiotic in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain after pelvic inflammation.Methods:150 cases of pelvic inflammatory sequelae were randomly divided into two groups,90 cases in the treatment group were given Xiaojin capsule for 4 weeks;the control group was given oral metronidazole and Cefaclor Capsules for 2 weeks.The cure rate and total effective rate of the two groups were compared.Results:The cure rate and total effective rate were 90%,96.7%respectively in the treatment group,66.7%and 85%in the control group respectively,the cure rate and total effective rate in the treatment group were significantly higher than those in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:Xiaojin capsule was better than oral antibiotics in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain,and it was worth popularizing.

关 键 词：盆腔炎 慢性盆腔痛 小金胶囊 疗效 

分 类 号：R271.3[医药卫生—中医妇科学]