检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]深圳市光明新区人民医院,广东深圳518106
出 处:《中医临床研究》2018年第27期49-50,共2页Clinical Journal Of Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的:探讨鼻内镜辅助下低温等离子消融与电动吸切器治疗腺样体肥大的临床效果。方法:本次研究中根据不同治疗方法将我院2013年6月—2018年2月收治的腺样体肥大患儿128例分为两组:选择电动吸切器治疗对照组患儿45例,选择低温等离子消融治疗观察组患儿83例;将两组患者围手术治疗相关指标数值及临床治疗效果作对比分析,包括手术时间及术中出血量、恢复通气时间、住院时间以及治疗总有效率。结果:观察组患儿相关指标数值均优于对照组(P <0.05);观察组治疗总有效率(97.6%)高于对照组(80.0%),P <0.05。结论:腺样体肥大患者接受鼻内镜辅助下低温等离子消融治疗的效果更佳。Objective:To investigate the clinical effect of low temperature plasma ablation assisted by nasal endoscope and electric suction cutter on adenoid hypertrophy.Methods:128 children with adenoid hypertrophy admitted to and treated in our hospital from June 2013 to February 2018 were divided into two groups according to different treatment methods.In the control group,45 children were treated with electric suction cutter,and 83 children in the observation group were treated with low temperature plasma ablation.The values of the indicators related to perioperative treatment and clinical treatment effect were compared between the two groups,including operation time and intraoperative blood loss,recovery time of ventilation,hospitalization time and total treatment efficiency.Results:The relative index values of the observation group were better than those of the control group(P<0.05),the total effective rate of treatment in the observation group was 97.6%,which was higher than that of the control group,80.0%,P<0.05.Conclusion:Low temperature plasma ablation assisted by nasal endoscope and electric suction cutter was more effective in treating adenoid hypertrophy.
分 类 号:R764.2[医药卫生—耳鼻咽喉科]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.221.242.128