“学术社会”之建构艰难:顾颉刚与中央研究院史语所关系考述——兼论与傅斯年的关系  

Difficulties in the Construction of “Academic Society”:Ku Chiehkang and Institute of History and Philology Academia of Sinica——Concurrently Discussing the Relationship with Fu Sinian

作　　者：李周峰 LI Zhou-feng(School of Marxism,Guizhou Normal University,Guiyang 550025,China)

机构地区：[1]贵州师范大学马克思主义学院,贵州贵阳550025

出　　处：《贵州师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2018年第6期123-131,共9页Journal of Guizhou Normal University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社科基金西部项目"顾颉刚‘学术社会’理想及其实践研究"(18XZS022)阶段性成果

摘　　要：建构一个"学术社会"是顾颉刚一生的理想。但是他在参与筹建中央研究院史语所过程中,且担任专任研究员的情况下,仍极力维持中山大学语史所,打造他理想中的"学术社会",由此引发了他由专任主动改为特约研究员的事件。而他与傅斯年性格与行事的冲突,最终使他脱离与史语所的关系,也导致两人关系的破裂。顾与傅关系的破裂表明,从传统"士"到近代"学人"的转变过程中,社会人格蜕变与转型的不易,也意味着"学术社会"理想建设的艰难与波折。Constructing an“academic society”was the ideal of Ku Chiehkang’s life.However,he was involved in the preparation of the Institute of History and Philology Academia of Sinica,and he was a full-time researcher.In order to build his ideal“academic society”,he still strived to maintain the Institute of Philology and History at Chungshan University.It caused him to be changed from a full-time researcher to a special researcher.And the conflict between him and Fu Sinian’s character and acting style,which eventually led him out of the relation with the Institute of History and Philology Academia.The breakdown of the relationship between Gu and Fu showed that in the process of transformation from the traditional“scholars”to the modern“scholars”was not easy because of the transformation of social personality,but also meant the difficulties and twists of ideal construction.

关 键 词：顾颉刚 傅斯年 中央研究院史语所 “学术社会” 

分 类 号：K262[历史地理—历史学]