检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孔慧芳 KONG Hui-fang(School of Foreign Studies,Anhui Jianzhu University,Hefei 230022,China)
出 处:《安徽理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2018年第5期54-59,共6页Journal of Anhui University of Science and Technology:Social Science
基 金:安徽省哲学社会科学规划项目(2014AHSKYD136);安徽省教育厅人文社科项目重点项目(2016SKA0226)
摘 要:长久以来,学界就注意到轻声的产生和词频相关。但由于研究手段的限制,关于轻声的产生和词频相关性的定量研究还不是很多。运用语音实验法,采用主客观相结合的频率确定方法,对江淮官话方言代表之一的合肥话的轻声,进行了定量和定性研究。研究结果表明:合肥话的轻声音节和词汇的频率有着密切的相关性。越是高频的轻声词汇其时长越短、音高越低、音强越弱;越是低频的轻声词汇其时长越长、音高越高、音强越强。但这种显著的词频效应主要体现在高频、低频两个频率组别之间;高频、中频组的声学差异尚未达到统计学上的显著性。同时,入声与轻声的组合在音高、音强、时长三个维度方面没有体现出明显的频率效应。这说明,我们需要重新考虑入声与轻声在合肥话中的语音性质。The connection between tonal neutralization and lexical frequency has been observed for a long time,but has never been investigated quantitatively because of methodological challenge.In this study,a production experiment was run with speakers reading disyllabic neutral tones words in Hefei dialect.The frequency estimates are derived from a combination of subjective Frequency Dictionary and objective Frequency rating.ANOVA analysis showed that neutralization of tones is directly correlated with lexical frequency independent of other factors.The exact shape of such effects displays different scenario in different frequency range.Only high frequency words display significant difference from low frequency words.The rushing tone combination is the only exception to the correlation between tonal neutralization and lexical frequency,which needs our new interpretation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49