检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周力 屈美敏[1] 费建[1] 张锡凤[1] 胡铮[1] 陈玲玲[1] Li Zhou;Mei-min Qu;Jian Fei;Xi-feng Zhang;Zheng Hu;Ling-ling Chen(Department of Anesthesiology,Children's Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing,Jiangsu 210008,China)
机构地区:[1]南京医科大学附属儿童医院麻醉科,江苏南京210008
出 处:《中国现代医学杂志》2018年第33期98-102,共5页China Journal of Modern Medicine
摘 要:目的探究丙泊酚联合骶管阻滞对下腹部麻醉患儿血流动力学及血清人β淀粉样蛋白1-42(Aβ_(1-42))、人β淀粉样蛋白1-40(Aβ_(1-40))的影响。方法选取2016年2月-2017年4月在儿童医院行下腹部手术的患儿73例作为研究对象,根据随机数字表法分为对照组(36例)和观察组(37例)。对照组患儿采用氯胺酮﹑丙泊酚复合静脉麻醉的麻醉方式,观察组患儿采用丙泊酚联合骶管阻滞的麻醉方式。比较两组患儿的麻醉效果﹑血流动力学指标﹑血清Aβ_(1-42)和Aβ_(1-40)水平及不良反应的发生情况。结果观察组患儿的麻醉诱导时间、苏醒时间均短于对照组(P<0.05);观察组与对照组收缩压、舒张压及心率组内、组间及时间变化趋势有差异(P<0.05),观察组变化趋势较小;麻醉前后两组患儿Aβ_(1-40)和Aβ_(1-42)水平的比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05);观察组患儿各种不良反应的发生率均低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论丙泊酚联合骶管阻滞对行下腹部手术的患儿进行麻醉时,麻醉效果好,对血流动力学及血清Aβ_(1-42)、Aβ_(1-40)的影响小,因而发挥作用更为平稳、且不良反应的发生率低,值得推广应用。Objective To investigate the effect of Propofol combined with sacral block on hemodynamics and serum human amyloid beta 1-42(A beta 1-42)and human amyloid beta 1-40(A beta 1-40)in children undergoing lower abdominal anesthesia.Methods Totally 70 children who had lower abdominal surgery in our hospital from February 2016 to April 2017 were chosen as the research subjects,and divided into control group(36 cases)and observation group(37 cases)according to the table of random number.Children in the control group received Ketamine and Propofol in intravenous anesthesia,while the children in the observation group received Propofol combined with sacral block for anesthesia.The effects of anesthesia,hemodynamic parameters,serum A beta(1-42),A beta(1-40)and adverse reactions between the two groups were compared.Results The anesthesia induction time and recovery time of the observation group were shorter than those of the control group,and the difference was statically significant(P<0.05);there was no significant difference in the duration of anesthesia between the two groups(P>0.05);the variation trend of systolic blood pressure,diastolic blood pressure and heart rate between the observation group and the control group were significantly different(P<0.05);the variation trend of observation group was smaller than that of the observation group;the differences of the levels of A beta(1-40)and A beta(1-42)before and after anesthesia were not statically significant(P>0.05);the incidences of adverse reactions in the observation group were lower than that in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusions Propofol combined with sacral block in children undergoing lower abdominal anesthesia shows better anesthetic effect,while has little influence on hemodynamics,serum A beta(1-42)and A beta(1-40).The incidence of adverse reactions is low and worthy of popularization and application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.188.211.44