检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曹盛民 史万兵[1] CAO Sheng-min;SHI Wan-bing(School of Humanities&Law,Northeastern University,Shenyang 110169,China;Physical Education Department,Northeastern University,Shenyang 110819,China)
机构地区:[1]东北大学文法学院,辽宁沈阳110169 [2]东北大学体育部,辽宁沈阳110819
出 处:《东北大学学报(社会科学版)》2018年第6期608-614,共7页Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)
基 金:国家社会科学基金资助项目(BFA150043);高等学校学科创新引智计划资助项目(B16009)
摘 要:合理选择与运用高校体育政策工具,能够实现高校体育政策预期目标,推动高校体育事业健康、快速发展。采用内容分析法,依据政策工具理论,对50份具有代表性的高校体育政策文本进行深入剖析,揭示我国在高校体育治理工具运用与选择方面的一般规律。结果显示,弱势均衡的供给型政策工具、分化明显的环境型政策工具、匮乏缺位的需求型政策工具是我国高校体育政策文本的表征,并提出适度降低环境型政策工具的占比,重视供给型政策工具、需求型政策工具的使用,健全有操作性、实效性强的政策工具,建议实现高校体育政策工具多样化、均衡化运用,以此促进我国高校体育事业蓬勃发展。The rational selection and application of university sport policy tools can basically achieve the expected goals of university sports policy and promote the healthy and rapid development of university sports.By means of content analysis and policy tool theory,50 representative texts of university sport policy are analyzed in depth,which reveals the general laws in the application and selection of university sport management tools in China.The results show that the supply-oriented policy tools are weakly balanced,the environmental policy tools are clearly differentiated and the demand-based policy tools are absent,which are characteristic of the texts of sport policy in colleges and universities in China.It is put forward that the proportion of environmental policy tools should be appropriately reduced,both supply and demand policy tools should be emphasized,and the operational and effective policy tools should be improved.It is proposed to diversify and balance the use of the university sport policy tools so as to promote the vigorous development of university sports in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28