英美电力市场用户及调度成本覆盖的思考与启示  

Reflection and enlightenment on customer and dispatch cost coverage of British and American electricity markets

作　　者：肖艳炜[1] 高怡静 李继红[1] 林凯颖 郑亚先 王蓓蓓[2] XIAO Yan-wei;GAO Yi-jing;LI Ji-hong;LIN Kai-ying;ZHENG Ya-xian;WANG Bei-bei(State Grid Zhejiang Electric Power Company,Hangzhou 310000,China;College of Electrical Engineering, SoutheastUniversity,Nanjing210096,China;Nanjing Branch of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Nanjing210008,China)

机构地区：[1]国网浙江省电力公司,杭州310000 [2]东南大学电气工程学院,南京210096 [3]中国电科院南京分院,南京210008

出　　处：《电力需求侧管理》2018年第6期61-64,共4页Power Demand Side Management

基　　金：国家电网公司科技项目"省级电力现货市场运营推演平台研究与开发"(52110118000A)

摘　　要：以英国电力库时期、NETA时期和美国PJM时期电力市场为例,分析对比三者在用电侧和调度的成本覆盖情况,并且分别从市场运营特点的整体性和3种交易模式在交易和费用制度的繁复程度上、市场的组织形式上、价格的稳定和导向性上、市场运行的透明度上的优劣势进一步分析不同电力市场的运营模式。最后结合我国的实际情况,提出我国电力市场建设方面的相关建议。POOL,NETA and PJM electricity markets are tak-en as examples to analyze the cost coverage in the process of elec-tricity production.In the part of cost coverage,the cost generation and corresponding way of cost coverage is analyzed from two as-pects:user and dispatch.Then the overall characteristics,advan-tages and disadvantages of the three transaction modes form the perspectives of the complexity of the transaction and charging sys-tem,the organization of the market,then stability and guidance of the price,and the transparency of the market operation are ana-lyzed respectively.At last,on the basis of the research,the related suggestions are given,combined with the national conditions in China.

关 键 词：电力市场 成本覆盖 辅助服务 

分 类 号：F416.61[经济管理—产业经济] TK018[动力工程及工程热物理]