检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:石玉英[1] SHI Yuying(Law School,Hunan University,Changsha,Hunan 410082,China)
出 处:《财经理论与实践》2018年第6期153-157,共5页The Theory and Practice of Finance and Economics
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目(13&ZD012);湖南大学国家腐败预防与惩治协同创新中心及法治湖南建设与区域社会治理协同创新中心平台建设阶段性成果。
摘 要:随着经济全球化的推进,尤其在"一带一路"建设背景下,我国对外投资和外商直接投资日益庞大。而我国缺乏完善的反海外贿赂法律体系,使得境外投资企业所面临的反贿赂执法风险日益突出。作为惩治海外贿赂的全球第一个且最有影响力的国家,美国对境外投资企业有较完善的反贿赂法律规制,并且因为新采取了一系列的制度设计而取得了较好的实施效果,研究其成功经验将对我国反海外贿赂法律体系的构建和完善具有重要启示意义。As the economic globalization pushes on,especially under the background of ONE BELT&ONE ROAD construction,our investment abroad and foreign direct investment in our country expands rapidly.The insufficiency of a perfect anti-foreign bribery legal system makes enterprises investing overseas face increasingly prominent risk.As the first and most weighty country in the world in anti-foreign bribery practices,the USA has a better legal regulation against foreign bribery practices.Due to a series of new system designs,the enforcement of FCPA is satisfactory.The successful experiences of American legal regulation against foreign bribery practices offer important enlightenment on the construction and improvement of China's anti-foreign bribery legal system.
关 键 词:境外投资企业海外贿赂制度设计立法实施
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28