检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐聪颖[1]
机构地区:[1]江西财经大学法学院
出 处:《知识产权》2018年第11期19-27,共9页Intellectual Property
基 金:国家社科基金项目"我国知识产权损害赔偿计算问题的实证研究"(16BFX137)的阶段性研究成果
摘 要:知识产权裁量性判赔在本质上属于侵权损害的法律评价机制,是法官合理解决当事人利益纷争的基本实践模式。就我国而言,法官在现阶段对裁量性判赔的运用存在形式意义大于实质意义的问题,为进一步提升裁量性判赔的实效,法官的裁量活动应重点围绕损害评价内容的确定、损害评价过程的呈现以及损害评价策略的选择与运用等三方面工作展开。Discretionary damages in relation to intellectual property litigation are essentially a kind of legal evaluation mechanism for tort damages.It is a basic practice adopted by judges to reasonably resolve the interests disputes between parties.Currently,the discretionary damages are applied by Chinese judges mainly in its formal meaning rather than substantial meaning.To raise the efficiency of discretionary damages,the judges should mainly engage in the following three aspects:what should be evaluated,how to present the evaluation process,and how to choose and apply the evaluation strategies.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15