检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华中科技大学应用经济学 [2]三峡大学
出 处:《知识产权》2018年第11期82-86,共5页Intellectual Property
基 金:国家社科基金“国家治理体系和治理能力现代化”重点研究专项:《贯穿新发展理念与国家治理现代化研究》(项目号:17VZL002)。
摘 要:中美贸易战表面上是贸易之争,实则是以知识产权为核心的科技实力竞争。世界经济发展的趋势是"知识经济"和"经济全球化",两者共同指向知识产权保护。为与国际接轨,中国政府已积极依法严格保护知识产权,但始终不能满足美国苛刻的主观标准。从长远来看,世界统一的知识产权保护制度对不同国家存在巨大的效率差异,为从根本上解决知识产权争端,需根据国情精准区别,在适应生产力发展水平的基础上把握知识产权保护力度,建立更均衡的知识产权保护制度。本文从中美贸易战出发,回顾历史上三个阶段的中美知识产权争端,以知识产权壁垒、产业、企业三方面对知识产权进行相应的风险识别,从国内、国际层面分析提出了异质均衡保护,作为一种新的保护体系其意蕴是世界各国应站在人类命运共同体的高度,根据本国基本国情构建知识产权异质且均衡的保护体系以达到共同发展的目的。The US-China trade war is superficially trade dispute,but essentially science and technology competition surrounding intellectual property.The world is developing toward“knowledge economy”and“economic globalization”,both stress intellectual property protection.To keep up with the trend,Chinese government has taken strict measures to protect intellectual property,however can not satisfy US’s harsh subjective standard.In the long run,a unified intellectual property protection system may produce different effects on different countries.To fundamentally resolve the intellectual property disputes,it is suggested to protect intellectual property in line with a country’s production level and establish a balanced intellectual protection system.The paper sets out from the US-China trade war,reviews the US-China intellectual property disputes occurred in three historical stages,identifying risks from three aspects,namely,IP barrier,industry,and enterprises,and proposes the concept of heterogeneous balanced protection based on domestic and international analysis.As a new protection system,the heterogenous balanced protection means to construct a balanced protection system according to a nation’s real situation,to achieve common development.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.147.13.233