检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:栾时春[1] LUAN Shichun(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201620,China)
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学,上海201620
出 处:《中国司法鉴定》2018年第6期9-15,共7页Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences
摘 要:中国的专家辅助人制度发展经历了实务探索期和法律规制期两个阶段。专家辅助人制度在运行的过程中存在着对专家辅助人行为性质认识不足、诉讼中制度异化、身份混乱等情况。专家辅助人制度需要理性看待,既要认清专家辅助人制度与专家咨询制度、重新鉴定制度的竞争关系,也要看清专家辅助人制度的天然劣势。要让专家辅助人制度更好地发挥作用,需要从与鉴定制度整合、资质认定、出庭决定权归为当事人、法官提供必要协助专家辅助人义务等方面的完善。The development of the expert assistant system in China has gone through two stages,namely,the practice exploration period and the legal regulation period.In the process of running the expert assistant system,there exist the following problems:a lack of understanding of the nature of the expert assistant's behavior,institutional alienation in litigation,and identity confusion.The expert assistant system needs to be treated rationally.It is necessary to recognize the competitive relationship between the expert assistant system and the expert consultation system and the re-appraisal system.It is also necessary to be clear of the natural disadvantages of the expert assistant system.In order for the expert assistant system to play a better role,it needs to be perfected from the aspects of coordination with the appraisal system,qualification identification,decision-making power of the parties,and the obligation of judges to provide necessary assistance to the experts.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229