主观程序正义研究及其启示  

A Study of Subjective Procedural Justice and Its Implication

作　　者：冯健鹏[1] 

机构地区：[1]华南理工大学法学院

出　　处：《环球法律评论》2018年第6期117-131,共15页Global Law Review

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目"我国宪法基本权利的程序保障机制研究"(13CFX025)的研究成果

摘　　要：多年来,程序正义一方面作为法治的基础性原则受到学界重视和强调,另一方面关于程序正义在中国特定社会环境中能起到多大作用的质疑也不绝于耳,双方形成了可称之为"程序正义普遍性问题"的理论争议。这一理论问题在我国实践中常涉及到"程序失灵"的现象。"主观程序正义"的研究为回答"程序正义是否具有普遍性"提供了新的思路。相关研究揭示了被称为"挫败效应"的程序失灵发生机制,即在人们对制度整体不信任的情况下,表面上的程序正义反而更令人们不满意。关于"挫败效应"的研究,对于分析我国当前实践中公共决策领域的"参与疲劳"、司法公信力建设等,均有参考价值;对于程序正义理论体系建构和相关制度的建设,也有启发意义。For many years,procedural justice has been emphasized by the academic community as a basic principle of the rule of law.However,there has always been the question of“whether procedural justice can play a role in the specific social environment of China”.The current theoretical controversy in China over the“universality of procedural justice”is focused on the“procedural failure”in Chinese legal practice.Subjective procedural justice provides a new way of thinking for answering the question of“whether procedural justice is universal”.Relevant researches reveal a mechanism of procedural failure called“the frustration effect”,that is,when the people have lost their faith in the system as a whole,superficial procedural justice can make them even more dissatisfied with the system.The research on the“frustration effect”is conducive to the analysis of some phenomena related to“procedural failure”in China,such as“participation fatigue”in the field of public decision-making,and the construction of judicial credibility,as well as to the construction of the procedural theory and relevant systems at the macro level.

关 键 词：主观程序正义 正当程序 程序失灵 挫败效应 

分 类 号：D916.1[政治法律—法学]