检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:叶敏[1] 张晔[1] Ye Min;Zhang Ye
机构地区:[1]江南大学法学院
出 处:《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》2018年第6期128-136,共9页Journal of Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
基 金:江苏省社会科学基金项目(15FXC002);江南大学自主科研计划重点项目(2017JDZD17)的资助
摘 要:针对电子商务类纠纷数量多、跨区域、消费者维权成本高等特点,专门的互联网法院在经由电子商务网上法庭试点后应运而生,其诉讼流程全部在线进行,大大减轻了当事人负担,提高了司法效率。最新出台的《关于互联网法院审理案件若干问题的规定》更为其推广奠定了坚实的制度基础。但这一新型审判组织形式仍存在安全性风险较高、举证规则漏洞以及司法严肃性不足等问题,建议通过限制经营者的程序转换申请权,进一步完善证据规则和信息公开机制,并将案件执行情况与电子商务主体信用评价挂钩等做法,促进互联网法院在电子商务领域的有效运行。Based on e-commerce disputes characteristics of large quantity,transregional operation and high costs for consumers to safeguard their legal rights,Internet courts have been established after the pilot project of e-commerce online court was carried out,the litigation process of which was all conducted online.Internet courts have greatly reduced the burden on the parties and improved judicial efficiency.Moreover,the newly promulgated“Provisions of the Supreme People s Court on Several Issues Concerning the Trial of Cases by Internet Courts”have laid a solid institutional foundation for their popularization.However,this new trial organization type still has some problems,such as high security risks,loopholes in the rules of evidence and insufficient judicial seriousness,and so on.In order to promote the effective operation of Internet courts in e-commerce,it s suggested to restrict operators application right of procedure conversion,improve the rules of evidence and the mechanism of information disclosure,and link the case implementation to the credit evaluation of e-commerce operators and consumers.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3