检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京科技大学知识产权研究中心 [2]北京科技大学文法学院
出 处:《北京政法职业学院学报》2018年第4期6-12,共7页Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law
摘 要:随着人工智能技术的更新换代,人工智能正在逐步具备"发明创造"的"能力"。由人工智能做出的"发明创造",或者本身是突破性的技术创新,或者能为未来的技术创新奠定基础,应当通过法律制度给予回应。当人工智能代替自然人成为"发明创造"的主体,对该"发明创造"予以回应的最好的制度安排仍然是专利制度。如果人工智能的"发明创造"要落入专利法中发明、实用新型、外观设计的保护范围,该"发明创造"应当具备发明、实用新型、外观设计的授权条件。人工智能发明创造的专利权归属应当从所有权主义和约定主义两个角度入手来考虑。With the renewal and iteration of artificial intelligence technology,AI is gradually possessing the ability of invention and creation.The“invention and creation”by AI,which is either a breakthrough technical innovation itself or a foundation for future technical creation should be responded through a legal system.The patent system still remains the best system in response to the“invention and creation”the patent system when AI becomes the main body of“invention and creation”instead of natural persons.Will AI become the subject of the patent right?If“invention and creation”by AI falls into the protection of invention,utility model and appearance design in patent law,it will be endowed with the authorization conditions of invention,utility model and appearance design.Patent ownership of AI inventions and creations should be considered from the perspectives of ownership and conventionalism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.217.171.249