检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张安宁[1,2] 钱壮壮 ZHANG Aining;QIAN Zhuangzhuang(School of mechanical engineering, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001,China;Professional Committee of Colliery Mechatronics,China Coal Association,Shanghai 200030,China)
机构地区:[1]安徽理工大学机械工程学院,安徽淮南232001 [2]中国煤炭学会煤矿机电一体化专业委员会,上海200030
出 处:《煤矿机电》2018年第6期1-4,共4页Colliery Mechanical & Electrical Technology
基 金:安徽省教育厅科学研究重大项目"立井安全高效提升关键技术研究"(KJ2015ZD19)
摘 要:分析比较了立井多绳摩擦提升系统刚体和弹性体动力学模型,分别建立其动力学模型,并以某矿多绳摩擦提升系统为例对其进行了求解,通过防滑安全系数的对比分析,得出采用弹性体动力学模型对提升系统进行设计计算更为科学合理。研究结果为提升系统的设计计算提供重要的参考。The dynamic model of rigid body and elastic body of mult rope friction hoisting system in vertical shaft have been analyzed and compared,and their dynamic model have been established respectively.Taking the multi rope friction hoisting system of a mine as an example to solve the problem,through the comparative analysis of the antiskid safety factor,it is concluded that the elastic body dynamic model is more scientific and reasonable to design and calculate the hoisting system.The research results have been provided important reference for improving the design and calculation of the hoisting system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31