检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙婧芳[1] Sun Jingfang(Institute of Economics,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences)
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院经济研究所
出 处:《劳动经济研究》2018年第5期99-120,共22页Studies in Labor Economics
基 金:中国社会科学院创新工程项目"经济发展新常态下的收入分配研究"和"城乡居民增收行动2020研究"的资助
摘 要:本文基于Sen行为能力理论,借鉴多维贫困的衡量方法,使用中国城市劳动力调查(CULS)数据测量和分析了2001年和2010年第一代、第二代农民工非市民化的程度。研究发现,基于AF多维贫困指数测量的农民工非市民化程度显示,第二代农民工的非市民化程度高于第一代。与2001年相比,即使2010年农民工能够完全达到低标准的市民化要求,但高标准下的非市民化程度依然很高。剔除社会保险和子女教育维度之后,农民工市民化的难度将会大幅下降,其所面临的天花板有所打破。仅由个体特征测算的非市民化程度显示,2010年第一代农民工已经达到了高标准的要求,第二代中未达到高标准市民化要求的比例仅为28%,但代际差异依然突出。推进社会保险、教育等基本公共服务均等化仍是推动农民工市民化的重要内容。This paper evaluates degrees of non-citizenization of the first-and the second-generation rural migrant workers in2001and2010based on Sen's capability and multidimensional poverty framework.We find that non-citizention of the second-generation rural migrant workers is higher than that of the first-generation migrant workers based on AF indices.Compared with2001,migrant can reach the low citizenization standard in2010and but it is difficult for them to reach the high standard.Once we get rid of social insurance and children's education dimension from the framework,the difficulty of citizenization would be greatly decreased,and the ceiling of citizenization would be broken.AF indices calculated by individual dimensions show that the first-generation rural migrant workers can reach the high citizenization standard in2010and the ratio of the second-generation who can't reach the high standard is only28percent.Nonetheless,intergenerational differences always exist.Improving the equality of basic public services,especially in social insurance and education,is still important for promoting citizenization among rural migrant workers.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222